Cryptos69.com and Bitcoins69.com + Help me and earn up to 40% commission

[ForexAnalytics]

I'm looking for good offers on the following Domains (amongst others)

www.Cryptos69.com

www.Bitcoins69.com

www.Cryptocoin69.com

www.Cryptocoins69.com

www.Cryptocurrency69.com


AND

Help sell my Domains + Earn up to 40% Commission…..

Here’s the deal – I have a couple of hundred Crypto / Finance / Eco / “Individual” Domains to sell and I need some help. They vary from being worth a couple of hundred bucks to a five figure sum. I acquired the Domains in taking over a business and I need people who know this market and who know people in this market to help me get them sold…..

I’ve divided the domains into three levels – (A) those worth less than $999, (B) those from $1000 - $10,000 and (C) those that are $10,000+

If you can help me sell those in Category:

• A - I will pay you 25% so long as the sale price is over $100.
• B - I will pay you 25% of anything over $100 up to $999 and then 30% of anything from $1000 up to $10,000.
• C - I will pay you a straight 40% of any sales over $10,001.

If you are interested in using your knowledge and expertise to help me and to earn yourself some serious commission please email me back at [email protected] and tell me about yourself and why and how you can help me. I will then send you the list of Domains.

This is a serious offer and all transactions will be conducted via PayPal or Escrow. You will not be acting as my agent in any way whatsoever and all agreements made with third parties are subject to my approval ie you cannot firmly offer any particular domain to any particular third party without my agreement.

I am really looking forward to paying out some big bucks in commission.

Many thanks

Ben

 

[William]

Am I missing something or is there some kind of relevance of the "69"?

 

[ForexAnalytics]

I'm sure that google will come to your aid.....likely to be NSFW

 

[William]

Not sure I quite get the connection between the two...

Are they for people looking to break into a very niche cryptocurrency adult market?

 

[ForexAnalytics]

Each to his own, I guess...

 

[RobM]

Is this a sales thread or an opinion/appraisal/abuse thread?

 

[lazarus]

Am I missing something...
What has "69" got to do with blockchain?

BTW bitcoins70.com is FTR (which is one better!)

 

[RobM]

Moderator can we get this thread cleaned up? Or can we just start going through sales threads now commenting on the domain quality, insulting the OP, and asking general questions?

 

[gimpydog]

Rob, when a new member turns up with a story ("I acquired the Domains in taking over a business"), a load of recently registered domains of debatable quality offered for sale at high prices ("$10,000+") & with a proposition of great riches ("I will pay you a straight 40%"), isn't it entirely right & proper that other members ask pertinent questions to establish his bona fides?

 

[ForexAnalytics]

Really nice of you to talk about me rather than to me. If you have an issue or a question then message me and I'll try to help. If you're unhappy then take it to the mods. Apart from being rude it's not really your place to cast aspersions on me or my business.....

 

[RobM]

Rob, when a new member turns up with a story ("I acquired the Domains in taking over a business"), a load of recently registered domains of debatable quality offered for sale at high prices ("$10,000+") & with a proposition of great riches ("I will pay you a straight 40%"), isn't it entirely right & proper that other members ask pertinent questions to establish his bona fides?

That is what PMs are for. However calling someone a 'dreamer' and insinuating that domains are no good have no place in a sales thread. It would discourage people from ever listing and how would you feel if you posted a domain for sale and then I called you names and questioned you, not about the sale, but about the perceived quality of your domains in a public thread? It now seems this is acceptable. I would advise people to think twice about posting sales threads and it appears open season on 99% of the domains of 'debatable' quality listed. Also your post is a copout as none of the posts above were pertinent questions or trying to 'establish his bona fides'.

 

[ForexAnalytics]

Thanks Rob - I appreciate your comments in the absence of any mods...

 

[gimpydog]

That is what PMs are for.'.

Is that an Acorn forum rule, or just your opinion? I don't see it.

As evidenced above, I wasn't the only one thinking "what has a number synonymous with a sexual position got to do with cryptocurrency?" A question the OP has yet to answer in any meaningful way.

The name-calling is clearly wrong, but any one of us can press the 'report' button.

 

[gimpydog]

Really nice of you to talk about me rather than to me. If you have an issue or a question then message me and I'll try to help. If you're unhappy then take it to the mods. Apart from being rude it's not really your place to cast aspersions on me or my business.....

You say "aspersions", I say "due diligence".

 

[ForexAnalytics]

Do you need a rationale for a name ? If it works for you then that's fine, if it doesn't then just move on.

 

[lazarus]

You acquired these domians in a business take over and you now want to sell them?
Is this correct ?

 

[ForexAnalytics]

Yes - the business owned the domains. I bought it for other reasons so don't need the domains as they are not part of my core business

 

[lazarus]

So the previous business owner that you bought the business from freshly registered all of these domains 2 weeks ago?

 

[William]

That is what PMs are for. However calling someone a 'dreamer' and insinuating that domains are no good have no place in a sales thread. It would discourage people from ever listing and how would you feel if you posted a domain for sale and then I called you names and questioned you, not about the sale, but about the perceived quality of your domains in a public thread? It now seems this is acceptable. I would advise people to think twice about posting sales threads and it appears open season on 99% of the domains of 'debatable' quality listed. Also your post is a copout as none of the posts above were pertinent questions or trying to 'establish his bona fides'.

In my defence, my original question was a legitimate question - I didn't know if 69 genuinely had some kind of crypto relevance that I was not aware of as bizarre as that sounds! Only recently realised the relevance of 420..!