Legal action being threatened

[hunkydorey]

Thanks for you advice

Well it seems then I will have the option to resolve the issue before court, There's no way I'd dispute the issue and I'll just hand them over.

I will stick to generics from now on

 

[domainscot]

disruptive give me a call mate on 07985621333
see can give you some help on the dispute

Yours

 

[grandin]

your right jac

correct jac..in that most contracts can be disputed.

You will find as the stakes get raised disputes materialise when they were not apparent before....

holes start to appear and your wood filler wont hold things together anymore....the wood has rotted and it must be replaced with good young wood..........

Oak may buck that trend...Mighty Oaks out of little Acorns indeed

Lee

 

[Jac]

correct jac..in that most contracts can be disputed.

People dispute things all the time Lee, but not necessarily for the right reasons.

You will find as the stakes get raised disputes materialise when they were not apparent before....

holes start to appear and your wood filler wont hold things together anymore....the wood has rotted and it must be replaced with good young wood..........

So, are you advocating that a minority should have the right to dicate to the majority? In which case I would repeat what I said before, "consensus is about majority acceptance not minority wish-lists". We may not like some of it, but it is democracy.

Regards
James Conaghan

 

[aqls]

How do you know that domains held speculatively are in the minority?

Bear in mind that even one domain registration per person could still be speculative so you can't just use numbers per registrant.

-aqls-

 

[grandin]

As aql says

Who knows any figures...Nominet (when I asked them) did not know how many of their registrants are consumers with consumer rights attached. You can't make assertion if the figures arent available.

If the majority are running a business then who has decided what busineses are allowed?

Anyway, this has no bearing as to whether the Nominet contract has fair or unfair terms. Its about...do you know your customer? then when you have ascertained who your customer is you then ask...is it fair and reasonable for the customer to understand the terms of the contract? As I said Nominet (at the time of asking) did not know how many of their customer were consumers with consumer rights?

Lee

 

[Jac]

How do you know that domains held speculatively are in the minority?

Bear in mind that even one domain registration per person could still be speculative so you can't just use numbers per registrant.

-aqls-

Fair point.

I guess I am looking at averages and who is most likely to hold speculative registrations.

Regards
James Conaghan

 

[grandin]

Nominet closed

So was Nominet closed for the afternoon...cause Michael was private messaging at 2.47pm...apparently not scared off...just being even more private

Lee

 

[fred]

So was Nominet closed for the afternoon...cause Michael was private messaging at 2.47pm...apparently not scared off...just being even more private

Lee

Can't you stop stalking him and let him get on with his life

 

[grandin]

Jac

None of it adds up.

I will end with this:-

Michael Penman of Nominet recommended that I visit Acorn Domains to get an answer to a question.

The site was endorsed by Nominet.

I am aware of the content of the website, therefore was Nominet aware of the content of the website when making the recommendation to me?

Lee

 

[robrob is verified member.]

Ah well, and after all that the world is still spinning and tonight it will go dark.

thank f**k for that.

 

[Jac]

None of it adds up.

I will end with this:-

Michael Penman of Nominet recommended that I visit Acorn Domains to get an answer to a question.

The site was endorsed by Nominet.

Whilst I am sure Acorn Domains would love to be endorsed by the UK Registry, this is not the case. Nominet does not endorse specific fora.

Michael pointed you to Acorn because at the time he was trying to help you and if you remember correctly Lee, this was at the same time you were swamping Nominet and each individual PAB member with emails. Your emails actually mirrored a lot that was already being said on Acorn and he mistakenly believed, from the content of your emails, that you were already a member of this forum.

Genuine mistake on both our parts but not the hanging offence you seem to think it is. So sue me but pleeeeaaaaaase ... give over now.

Regards
James Conaghan

 

[grandin]

Clearly jac

Acorn should have not been on his mind when dealing with me in a professional capacity, as such Nominet are accountable for his actions.

I am sorry but Trading Standards know of this so its down to them to consider whether such actions are professional or not.

Furthermore, how do you know what my conduct was like with Nominet, what have they disclosed to you?

Lee

 

[Jac]

Acorn should have not been on his mind when dealing with me in a professional capacity, as such Nominet are accountable for his actions.

I am sorry but Trading Standards know of this so its down to them to consider whether such actions are professional or not.

Personally, I look forward to their findings.

Furthermore, how do you know what my conduct was like with Nominet, what have they disclosed to you?

Lee, will you for God sake stop looking for conspiracy and fault in everything. Just because you think the world's out to get you doesn't mean they are, and certainly not me!

The reference I made to emails was because of the volume you sent to every single PAB member's individual email address; much of it overly long and confusing; so much so that the appointed PAB members (in particular) just didn't have a clue what you were complaining about. I had trouble keeping up myself because I couldn't for the life of me see the connection between the different issues you were mixing up and if you remember correctly I told you so. Instead of thanks I got threats of holding my emails against me in a court of law. <sigh>

I know you were sending Nominet a lot of emails because by your own actions in emailing me you involved me in the issue. I take my responsibilities as a PAB member seriously and contacted Nominet to enquire as to the facts in the issue. I am allowed to do that because the PAB should represent stakeholders' views; that's what the PAB's mandate is; to be representative. You involved me, I followed up on your behalf, so please do not suggest to me, or this forum, that you now have an objection to someone from the PAB trying to help too!

Regards
James Conaghan

 

[grandin]

amusing

Actually jac that was amusing. Yes I did send several emails to pab members to see if they could keep it professional when issues were at hand. What I didn't bank on was the fact that pab elected members are not linked in anyway to Nominet ie. do not represent Nominets views...therefore all those emails from the elected members had no bearing to my assessment of Nominet conduct.

Just to recap when you contact the DTI: My concern is the expert decisions do not reflect the policy (as written) or the Policy doesn't reflect the experts decisions.....in respect to 3aia of the Policy.

Lee