• Welcome to AcornDomains.co.uk, a friendly community for UK domain investors, developers and anyone interested in domain names.

    Whether you're looking to buy or sell domains, learn more about the UK domain market, get feedback on your names, or simply chat with other domainers, you're in the right place. AcornDomains has been bringing together people from across the UK domain industry for many years, from complete beginners to experienced investors.

    Have a look around, join the discussions and, if you haven't already, create a free account and introduce yourself.

Nominet Quote

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 30, 2006
Posts
1,298
Reaction score
10
A classic Nominet quote 'The court of Appeal made it clear in the One In a million case(1) that there were limits on what a rgistrant could do with a domain name'

Oh yes, and where did you make this clear in your contract?

thats right....Trading Standards states to me 'appears'

One may disappear

Lee
 
Undefined Limits

Lee, limits aren't defined in the contract.

Nominet have only defined that when you register a domain name you gain a right to derive the benefit of its undefined USE.

BUT if you take advantage of another's rights the domain name can become abusive.

BUT an expert can't define whats abusive because he/she doesnt know the rights of the registrant.i.e. all Nominet have said is that when you register a domain name you gain a right to derive the benefit of its undefined USE.

It would be all OK IF the experts were considering whats abusive in law BUT they have clearly defined (recently) that they do NOT decide Trade Mark Infringement OR Passing Off they merely follow the policy which includes the contract which includes the right of registration ie. the right to derive the benefit of its undefined USE.

I can't see how Nominet have followed the contract in any instance IF they have relied on the experts decision that is based on the DRS policy.

Lee
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom