- Joined
- Apr 5, 2005
- Posts
- 9,729
- Reaction score
- 1,312
You know, Nominet have anecdotally stated there's "broad support" for .uk whereas our collective instinct suggests otherwise.
But all of this is very touchy-feely, wishy-washy... so I took a rather more "scientific" approach.
I analysed 185 articles about .uk (the ones I've collected since the first consultation began) and assigned each article a score from 1 (strongly negative) through 3 (neutral/no opinion) to 5 (strongly positive).
I then collated all this data, and found that only 11 articles had anything good to say about .uk (6%).
If you kick out all the "neutral" articles (many of which just quoted bits of the consultation documents with no editorial comment) then just 11 out of the remaining 115 articles were positive (9.5%) while the rest were negative.
I've compiled all the above into a blog post, with a couple of pie charts and a link to the original data, in case anyone wants to check my methodology or dig deeper.
http://www.webmastering.co.uk/domain-names/media-sentiment-analysis-for-the-concept-of-uk-domains/
But all of this is very touchy-feely, wishy-washy... so I took a rather more "scientific" approach.
I analysed 185 articles about .uk (the ones I've collected since the first consultation began) and assigned each article a score from 1 (strongly negative) through 3 (neutral/no opinion) to 5 (strongly positive).
I then collated all this data, and found that only 11 articles had anything good to say about .uk (6%).
If you kick out all the "neutral" articles (many of which just quoted bits of the consultation documents with no editorial comment) then just 11 out of the remaining 115 articles were positive (9.5%) while the rest were negative.
I've compiled all the above into a blog post, with a couple of pie charts and a link to the original data, in case anyone wants to check my methodology or dig deeper.
http://www.webmastering.co.uk/domain-names/media-sentiment-analysis-for-the-concept-of-uk-domains/