- Joined
- Jan 7, 2006
- Posts
- 1,699
- Reaction score
- 13
Nominet will not respond to requests whether they will be providing a Nomensa summary when they publish the Nominet summary on the .uk consultation in November.
I thought I would just check again the Nominet summary for bias to see if an independent report is really required.
This is an early extract from the Nominet summary V1;
So in 2 paragraphs those against .uk which were a 'small minority', moved to be equal to a group which was a 'significant proportion'.
You can decide if an independent summary report is required. Note with Nomensa report inn V1 they did not have access to feedback from any meetings held.
The Nominet V1 .uk summary can be found at
http://www.nominet.org.uk/sites/default/files/SummaryofdirectukFeedback_1.pdf
I thought I would just check again the Nominet summary for bias to see if an independent report is really required.
This is an early extract from the Nominet summary V1;
Part I: Summary of key themes in the consultation feedback (page 11)
Principle of introducing direct.uk
"a small proportion of stakeholders declared that they were
fundamentally opposed to the concept of the direct.uk proposition which enabled registrations at the second level"
2 paragraphs later;
"significant proportion (although less than half) of stakeholders supported the package
presented by the direct.uk proposals, about the same proportion of stakeholders were opposed to
the overall concept"
So in 2 paragraphs those against .uk which were a 'small minority', moved to be equal to a group which was a 'significant proportion'.
You can decide if an independent summary report is required. Note with Nomensa report inn V1 they did not have access to feedback from any meetings held.
The Nominet V1 .uk summary can be found at
http://www.nominet.org.uk/sites/default/files/SummaryofdirectukFeedback_1.pdf
Last edited: