Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.
I'm releatively new to all of this.... I am a network engineer that deals with routing / switching "daily"... Can you clarify your question as I'm a little confused on the point?
Thanks,
I'm releatively new to all of this.... I am a network engineer that deals with routing / switching "daily"... Can you clarify your question as I'm a little confused on the point?
Thanks,
I think you will find 'Websaway comment' is a reference to you being the registrant/seller of all the extensions of a given term.
terms that hold commercial/resale value are very rarely held by one registrant, unless they were hand regged about 12-15+ years ago or the registrant was fortunate enough to identify a new market area before the mainstream.
If you find a collection of extensions refering to one TERM it is unlikely to hold value except to the holder of those terms
Thank you for the clarification. routing101 is the only domain I own with .net / .com / .org so that does make sense. I originally planned on development with Routing101 and I still might (as side hobby) unless I could sell...
Thanks again for the response. I'm a Ciscio Certified Network Engineer that is heavily involved in routing networks... So, to answer your question ... The routing 101 was referencing routing networks (EIGRP/OSPF/BGP/RIP/etc....)
- as in "learning" or "entey level" routing class
The 101-suffix seems primarily to be a U.S.-oriented term, I don't really understand it (what happened to lessons 1-100?) but perhaps they think you mean a different kind of router.