- Joined
- Dec 25, 2004
- Posts
- 1,961
- Reaction score
- 375
-
Welcome to AcornDomains.co.uk, a friendly community for UK domain investors, developers and anyone interested in domain names.
Whether you're looking to buy or sell domains, learn more about the UK domain market, get feedback on your names, or simply chat with other domainers, you're in the right place. AcornDomains has been bringing together people from across the UK domain industry for many years, from complete beginners to experienced investors.
Have a look around, join the discussions and, if you haven't already, create a free account and introduce yourself.
UDRP: WIPO letter to ICANN
- Thread starter Whois-Search
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2004
- Posts
- 1,961
- Reaction score
- 375
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Posts
- 595
- Reaction score
- 8
Very interesting.
I recently raised the issue of supplemental submissions under the UDRP - notably allowed by unlawful Supplemental Rules operated by NAF. I should add that in this regard I do not think that WIPO's own practice is consistent with the UDRP.
The final paragraph on page 3 questions the merits of "the application of reduced panel fees in the case of respondent default..." Now who would have come up with that as a good idea in a dispute resolution service...
I recently raised the issue of supplemental submissions under the UDRP - notably allowed by unlawful Supplemental Rules operated by NAF. I should add that in this regard I do not think that WIPO's own practice is consistent with the UDRP.
The final paragraph on page 3 questions the merits of "the application of reduced panel fees in the case of respondent default..." Now who would have come up with that as a good idea in a dispute resolution service...
- Status
Similar threads
