Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

UK Gay Website Triumphs in ?Cyber Squatting? Case - UK Gay News (press release)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quite odd really:

“We were originally being asked for £30,000 to purchase the fitlads.com domain name from them. However, we initiated our purchase through official channels, and the escrow agent we used for security purposes quickly established that the squatter appeared to have no proof that they actually owned the domain name they were trying to re-sell us.

Seems like there's a lot missing from this story. They 'couldn't prove they owned it' but they were escrow service still transfered the name to another party, after someone (that they didn't think owned it) initiated the transfer.

I think the article confuses the definition between 'owned' and 'had rights to'

Plus it seems like the person who ended up with the name was willing to pay and was half way through the escrow process - definitely more to this story.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rule #1: Be Respectful

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members online

Premium Members

Latest Comments

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Systreg AcornBot:
    Systreg has left the room.
      Systreg AcornBot: Systreg has left the room.
      Top Bottom