Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. Share your own thoughts and experience, accounts may be terminated for violations.
  • Welcome to AcornDomains.co.uk, a friendly community for UK domain investors, developers and anyone interested in domain names.

    Whether you're looking to buy or sell domains, learn more about the UK domain market, get feedback on your names, or simply chat with other domainers, you're in the right place. AcornDomains has been bringing together people from across the UK domain industry for many years, from complete beginners to experienced investors.

    Have a look around, join the discussions and, if you haven't already, create a free account and introduce yourself.

US Court ruling

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Posts
1,386
Reaction score
10
A US Court has yesterday ruled that ,quote "..in my Judgment Mr X's appearance to defend the res did not constitute a waiver of personal jurisdiction because in personam jurisdiction cannot be based soley on an appearance in an in rem action.".

In laymans terms, you can appear and interject on behalf and in defence of "A" .com or other domain name without putting yourself at risk of costs and damages by accepting personal jurisdiction of the US Courts.

Lanham Act, Domain Name Disputes, US Courts,.com domains,Wipo, Verisign,

DG
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom