- Joined
- Jul 11, 2008
- Posts
- 4,616
- Reaction score
- 209
Didn't .to offer a shortening service some years ago, which the urls were http://to./word (this is a valid url), currently http://to./ resolves a website.
Nothing stopping the bbc doing http://bbc./news, but the learning curve for people to include that period, would be insane.
Nothing stopping the bbc doing http://bbc./news, but the learning curve for people to include that period, would be insane.
Monkey, you're correct about "news.bbc" not obviously being a URL. However I believe that "bbc/news" would also resolve, or if it currently wouldn't we'll soon see browsers update to accept URL's without a fullstop/period/dot. If/when browsers do accept URLs without fullstops/periods/dots, I believe it'll be much more likely that we'll see addresses in the format of gTLD/something than something.gtld.
(from iPad - K)