anne.org.uk and 29 other similar names

[jhump]

sorry they are sold to dougs he got there first

but according to you, he didn't:

in fact looking at PM's doug messaged me: "22-08-2007, 11:55 AM" just 10mins after you posted.

so doug claimed what was left 10 minutes after i4v.net.

 

[spanno]

but according to you, he didn't:



so doug claimed what was left 10 minutes after i4v.net.

he contacted me first

 

[jhump]

ok, that's clearly not what you said earlier but quite honestly I think it's your loss. good luck with your future sales.

 

[spanno]

Why would I do myself out of extra money of selling 5 for £50 by selling the whole lot to dougs for £35 if I had checked the thread?


I checked the thread in the morning, nothing new.
I got a message from dougs saying he wanted to the lot so I said ok.

I went back and looked at the thread later in the day and realised IV4.net had posted 10minutes before.

I have tried to apologise but there is no way I am undoing a done deal.

 

[spanno]

ok, that's clearly not what you said earlier but quite honestly I think it's your loss. good luck with your future sales.

Dougs's message got to me before I checked the thread.

 

[retired_member16]

What was the point of leaving me Negative feedback?

 

[olebean]

rep added for firestarter

 

[woopwoop]

Why would I do myself out of extra money of selling 5 for £50 by selling the whole lot to dougs for £35 if I had checked the thread?


I checked the thread in the morning, nothing new.
I got a message from dougs saying he wanted to the lot so I said ok.

I went back and looked at the thread later in the day and realised IV4.net had posted 10minutes before.

I have tried to apologise but there is no way I am undoing a done deal.

I think that 3 things are clear here:

1. Spanno has no idea about forum ettiquette with doing deals
2. Spanno is very scared that if he does the right thing and pulls those few domains from Dougs, that Dougs will not buy the rest
3. Dougs is well aware of this thread and that iv4 got there first, but his credibility should be brought into this. He has either contacted spanno after he saw iv4's post or is sitting back not willing to do the right thing. Either way this is clearly wrong.

The way that neither of these two are trying to solve this very simple issue is sickening. This could very easily be solved even now. By either spanno or Dougs!

It's a shame because it's kind of like the honour system of who posts first isn't working this time. I guess legally it doesn't mean anything - just a shame because it's fun and shows that people can be trusted and have integrity... just not this time

 

[paymatters]

Looks like an honest mistake to me?

Like the guy said he's make more selling 5 for £50 and then the rest at £35 rather than all at £35??

 

[woopwoop]

Looks like an honest mistake to me?

Like the guy said he's make more selling 5 for £50 and then the rest at £35 rather than all at £35??

If it's an honest mistake that can be fixed, why not fix it?

Possibly because he's worried he might miss out on the sale of the rest, if dougs doesn't want the rest without those names - after all he hasn't commented on this.

I might be cynical on this, and wrong, I guess I just liked the system as it was.

But honest mistakes do happen, and it might be one of those.

 

[retired_member16]

I think its now time to close this one down.