- Joined
- Mar 9, 2010
- Posts
- 3,402
- Reaction score
- 55
Hi,
I have a question, and yes I know the businesses concerned will say it is up to them as its their business, but with all the freedom to advertise and things they sign up to saying they will be fair, can anyone actually explain this.
When someone applies for a loan, in this case it was a loan to pay off an old loan and increase it slightly, but in reality its a whole new loan.
They haven't ever re payments ever been late or missed and the bank itself constantly calls them to offer loans.
Now I know what they say about credit scores and how much people earn, part time, full time employed, residential status etc, so most people with these issues, when taking out loans always expect they wont get the best rate.
So, the bank, offered them a loan for the full amount over the exact same period.
Now that's the important bit, same amount same period, from their own bank who has proof of excellent custom.
And yes their interest was much higher than the advertised rate. She has a new baby on the way, so although helpful, she will not be taking it at that rate.
So can anyone explain why?
If they said there is more risk, which they haven't, so they need their money back quicker, should really have them offer them less over a shorter period, they have many years history showing no sign of risk.
I know people just accept this, but is it fair lending, they sign up to numerous things which allow them to trade and advertise saying they will be fair.
Just seems mad that no one has challenged this. I know they think they can have it both ways but can they really?
I'm looking at helping them take this further, so although I enjoy peoples opinions, I am really after facts and insights from anyone in the know so to speak.
Thanks
I have a question, and yes I know the businesses concerned will say it is up to them as its their business, but with all the freedom to advertise and things they sign up to saying they will be fair, can anyone actually explain this.
When someone applies for a loan, in this case it was a loan to pay off an old loan and increase it slightly, but in reality its a whole new loan.
They haven't ever re payments ever been late or missed and the bank itself constantly calls them to offer loans.
Now I know what they say about credit scores and how much people earn, part time, full time employed, residential status etc, so most people with these issues, when taking out loans always expect they wont get the best rate.
So, the bank, offered them a loan for the full amount over the exact same period.
Now that's the important bit, same amount same period, from their own bank who has proof of excellent custom.
And yes their interest was much higher than the advertised rate. She has a new baby on the way, so although helpful, she will not be taking it at that rate.
So can anyone explain why?
If they said there is more risk, which they haven't, so they need their money back quicker, should really have them offer them less over a shorter period, they have many years history showing no sign of risk.
I know people just accept this, but is it fair lending, they sign up to numerous things which allow them to trade and advertise saying they will be fair.
Just seems mad that no one has challenged this. I know they think they can have it both ways but can they really?
I'm looking at helping them take this further, so although I enjoy peoples opinions, I am really after facts and insights from anyone in the know so to speak.
Thanks