It doesn't have too? Market overt has to do with transaction location not that of goods,,,
Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. Share your own thoughts and experience, accounts may be terminated for violations.
-
Welcome to AcornDomains.co.uk, a friendly community for UK domain investors, developers and anyone interested in domain names.
Whether you're looking to buy or sell domains, learn more about the UK domain market, get feedback on your names, or simply chat with other domainers, you're in the right place. AcornDomains has been bringing together people from across the UK domain industry for many years, from complete beginners to experienced investors.
Have a look around, join the discussions and, if you haven't already, create a free account and introduce yourself.
DNJ - Whitstable.co.uk - 12k
- Thread starter AssetDomains
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2013
- Posts
- 1,725
- Reaction score
- 43
Market Ouvert isn't applicable in UK. Nominet is based in UK. I've no idea where you're going with this but it doesn't appear to be anywhere sensible :laugh:
It would be absolutely impossible to pass good title to a stolen domain name outside of UK, as it could be taken back via Nominet and the UK legal system...
It would be absolutely impossible to pass good title to a stolen domain name outside of UK, as it could be taken back via Nominet and the UK legal system...
Never been sensible
I suppose I was just wondering what nom would do if some sly registrar / employee hacker etc registered uk rights unbeknown to the co.uk registrant (used a registrar in a member state market overt still exists) Then sold/kept them etc. As you can buy stolen antiquities, art etc that has market overt gained in another member state making it legally yours in the uk even if stolen here why would a domain be different ?
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2013
- Posts
- 1,725
- Reaction score
- 43
okay here is the longer version of my post:
The seller has deliberately ****** the buyer over. He has registered the .uk after the negotiations were done.
The buyer should have known better. It was naive to assume the seller was honest.
Sedo know there are major issues with the UK system but couldn't care less, they're knowingly letting it continue.
The seller has deliberately ****** the buyer over. He has registered the .uk after the negotiations were done.
The buyer should have known better. It was naive to assume the seller was honest.
Sedo know there are major issues with the UK system but couldn't care less, they're knowingly letting it continue.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2009
- Posts
- 1,188
- Reaction score
- 22
Rather than spend another 6 pages saying the same thing in a slightly different way. I'm just going to quote Monkey below.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Status
