Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. Share your own thoughts and experience, accounts may be terminated for violations.
  • Welcome to AcornDomains.co.uk, a friendly community for UK domain investors, developers and anyone interested in domain names.

    Whether you're looking to buy or sell domains, learn more about the UK domain market, get feedback on your names, or simply chat with other domainers, you're in the right place. AcornDomains has been bringing together people from across the UK domain industry for many years, from complete beginners to experienced investors.

    Have a look around, join the discussions and, if you haven't already, create a free account and introduce yourself.

DRS on the way

Status
Not open for further replies.
I do have a question for Nominet, why do they accept complaints without proof of trademark status? e.g. a trademark certificate.

Surely that should be a prerequisite?
 
Cheers for all the help guys, I am going through all the points and sending them to my solictor who thinks we have a good case, but shame we just never got that reply in.
 
The "problem" ,i.e. unfairness , of the DRS is that although the Complainant can use a Trademark to invoke a DRS a Respondent cannot use Trademark LAW to defeat said DRS, otherwise the Complainants would not win 90% of time, as they know full well.
Since the Intel case in the ECJ the task of proving passing off etc is much harder ,and thus the easy route for companies is DRS.

WS
 
The DRS is a lousy system to be honest. Did you know that neither the complainant nor the respondant are entitled to get to see what information is passed on to the 'expert' by Nominet, they can leave out as much or as little as they want, there is no way of knowing!
 
Last edited:
Which is exactly why I do not want to see Gilbert or Cowley get anymore power ,as they are seeking. They both are the type that supports big business and domainers are scum to them. Look at Gilbert, a senior partner in Wragge & Co, and you can guess who he would support in a DRS against a domainer, and he's in ultimate charge of the DRS . One day they will meet someone that take them to High Court and JR's the DRS decision on grounds of unfairness.

WS
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom