DRS Question

[Brassneck]

Just wondering - if somebody starts the DRS process and then gives up, are they allowed to start the process again some time later?

Thanks
Stephen.

 

[Beasty]

Just wondering - if somebody starts the DRS process and then gives up, are they allowed to start the process again some time later?

Thanks
Stephen.

It depends.

Yes - as long as you don't take it for an Expert's decision, you could in theory test the water any number of times.

However, once a decision has been made by an Expert there are rules set out in the Policy/Procedure that provide some sort of "Double Jeopardy " limit to future claims - as in general an unsuccesful decision should be appealed - not started again.

 

[grandin]

new evidence

The Policy only allows for a new dispute IF new evidence is provided...

This is how it goes...

Evidence
Decision
Appeal (based on ORIGINAL evidence subject to 18h of the procedure)

New evidence
Decision
Appeal (based on ORIGINAL evidence subject to 18h of the procedure)

On and on IF NEW EVIDENCE IS FORTHCOMING

Lee

 

[grandin]

Whats this

Oh brass....whats with the caravanfaultfinder??? alot of hits???

Also whats with the obession over org.uk?

Lee

 

[keys]

There is a domain which was subject to DRS, Complainant lost.

DRS repeated and Complainant won, but subesequently forgot or didn't bother to renew it. Rather a waste of £1500 plus all the time and effort involved.

 

[tifosi]

Each case though will have information given to the experts a case has been brought, even though it may have never got past the response/mediation phase.

It should be an influencer skewed towards the respondent