Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

IP owners face growing domain name danger

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Posts
595
Reaction score
8
"IP owners face growing domain name danger" according to Managing Intellectual Property.

MIP says that WIPO received more complaints (1,823) than in any of the previous 5 years. The articles goes on -

"WIPO said the effects of the use of computer software to register expired domain names automatically and redirect them to pay-per-click portal sites, the option to register names for free for a five-day so-called tasting period, the proliferation of new registrars and the establishment of new domains has created greater opportunities for the mass, often anonymous, registration of domain names without specific consideration of third-party IP rights.

"Recent developments in the domain name registration system have fostered practices which threaten the interests of trade mark owners and cause consumer confusion," said Francis Gurry, WIPO deputy director general.

"Practices such as domain name tasting risk turning the domain name system into a mostly speculative market."

And he said that the speed at which domain names change hands and the difficulty of tracking such mass automated registrations have created new challenges for trade mark owners wanting to pursue cybersquatters.

"With domain names becoming moving targets for rights holders, due consideration should be given to concrete policy responses," he added."

I'd love to see the stats for DRS - since if that too has risen then the domain tasting aspect can be discounted. Further , if a domain has expired, why is there an assumption that the regsitrant is a cybersquatter?

An alternative explanation may be lawyers chasing fees for more of these cases...

Anyway, the suggestion from the guy at WIPO that UDRP needs to be changed (for which I suggest you read "made more IP rights holder friendly") is the bit that alarmed me most.
 
doesnt seem like rocket science to me ..

many many more names registered now (not even counting the millions regged and dropped daily by the .com guys traffic fishing)

growing reliance online - more money spent advertising , buying , inevitable focus is pushed onto it..

not surprising more disputes
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rule #1: Be Respectful

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members online

No members online now.

Premium Members

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Lastest Listings

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Siusaidh AcornBot:
    Siusaidh has left the room.
      Siusaidh AcornBot: Siusaidh has left the room.
      Top Bottom