Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

Of interest and implication ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Posts
1,386
Reaction score
10
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/02/11/nominet_court_case/

Find it hard to see how they can say that "..or trading under the misleading 'Domain Registry Services' name." is enforceable. If that is
misleading then so is "Domain Registration Services" as used by many
legit registrars. Are you allowed even to call yourself a domain registrar ?.

Mind you having had first hand experience these Judges come from
a different planet to one on which common sense exists so hardly surprises
me

DG
 
Re Read

Hi and thanx 4 the article DG it was an interesting read.

Only a £81,000 charge, ok its a lot of money but I wonder just how many poor soles he scammed.

I think he got off lightly, people like that make me mad! :twisted:

Regards
 
Agreed I think what he was doing probably was dodgy but I havent
read the full info so cant really be sure, but the Judge has gone
too far.
DG
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rule #1: Be Respectful

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Premium Members

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Lastest Listings

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Siusaidh AcornBot:
    Siusaidh has left the room.
      Siusaidh AcornBot: Siusaidh has left the room.
      Top Bottom