public decision.. http://www.nominet.org.uk/digitalAssets/21873_rileys.pdf
-
Welcome to AcornDomains.co.uk, a friendly community for UK domain investors, developers and anyone interested in domain names.
Whether you're looking to buy or sell domains, learn more about the UK domain market, get feedback on your names, or simply chat with other domainers, you're in the right place. AcornDomains has been bringing together people from across the UK domain industry for many years, from complete beginners to experienced investors.
Have a look around, join the discussions and, if you haven't already, create a free account and introduce yourself.
rileys.co.uk
- Thread starter grandin
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Posts
- 595
- Reaction score
- 8
business as usual
Yes Fred, what is usual for Acorn is obviously not as usual for experts...
...Once upon a time, as part of a DRS consultation, a wise old expert wrote...
in-law a non defended complaint is judged in favour of the complainant
indeed...the expert failed to defend the attack element of my response
Lee
Yes Fred, what is usual for Acorn is obviously not as usual for experts...
...Once upon a time, as part of a DRS consultation, a wise old expert wrote...
in-law a non defended complaint is judged in favour of the complainant
indeed...the expert failed to defend the attack element of my response
Lee
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Posts
- 595
- Reaction score
- 8
Strange that TW did not know you were Mr GHD!
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2005
- Posts
- 2,216
- Reaction score
- 29
Didn't know or created distance between the role of expert and that of DRS supreme.. He did say, he didn't conduct any further research over and above that supplied by the complainant.."selective" research?
Lee
Congrats! Is it going to Appeal?
And
AND...
Interesting that the expert did not access the prss system between the complaint and the decision. I would assume the expert's firm does not subscribe to the prss...
Beasty, Nominet told me that a respondent or complainant can appeal a decision to have the appeal panel to answer procedural issues, saying that who wants to fork out £3k
Lee
AND...
Interesting that the expert did not access the prss system between the complaint and the decision. I would assume the expert's firm does not subscribe to the prss...
Beasty, Nominet told me that a respondent or complainant can appeal a decision to have the appeal panel to answer procedural issues, saying that who wants to fork out £3k
Lee
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2006
- Posts
- 595
- Reaction score
- 8
Didn't know or created distance between the role of expert and that of DRS supreme.. He did say, he didn't conduct any further research over and above that supplied by the complainant.."selective" research?
Lee
Congrats! Is it going to Appeal?
But he only had to remember it - he was the chair of that Appeal Panel!
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2005
- Posts
- 2,216
- Reaction score
- 29
But he only had to remember it - he was the chair of that Appeal Panel!
Selective search..
very true
Indeed beasty....deliberate statement i thought...
given the importance of the ghd case and the fact the Mr T Willoughby had no problem recalling the verbatim appeal one would presume he knows the 3 million word contract better than most....indeed you would expect him to set an example for novice registrants i.e. remembering all facts contained within the extensive drs archive
One point was very misleading....Mr Willoughby was inferring that proof of sales, advertising literature would move their rights into a different league.....incorrect, if at the outset Mr T Willoughby doesn't know of the rights holder the complaint must fail as Mr Grandin may well be as bright as Mr T Willoughby i.e. not knowing about the rights holder as the point of registration
Indeed, I merely went through the telephone book....borin bugger!
Lee
Indeed beasty....deliberate statement i thought...
given the importance of the ghd case and the fact the Mr T Willoughby had no problem recalling the verbatim appeal one would presume he knows the 3 million word contract better than most....indeed you would expect him to set an example for novice registrants i.e. remembering all facts contained within the extensive drs archive
One point was very misleading....Mr Willoughby was inferring that proof of sales, advertising literature would move their rights into a different league.....incorrect, if at the outset Mr T Willoughby doesn't know of the rights holder the complaint must fail as Mr Grandin may well be as bright as Mr T Willoughby i.e. not knowing about the rights holder as the point of registration
Indeed, I merely went through the telephone book....borin bugger!
Lee
thanks
thanks db, but i still get this awful feeling that someone is trying to corner me....two days ago i got a letter from a trade mark holder asking to buy the domain name for the golden £7500...bizarre or IP lawyer conspiracy? LOL
Lee
thanks db, but i still get this awful feeling that someone is trying to corner me....two days ago i got a letter from a trade mark holder asking to buy the domain name for the golden £7500...bizarre or IP lawyer conspiracy? LOL
Lee
- Status
