Charlie.uk reverted to the rightful registrant https://www.nominet.uk/whois/?query=charlie.uk&cc-num=#whois-result
That'd be the one that couldn't be arsed renewing it?
Charlie.uk reverted to the rightful registrant https://www.nominet.uk/whois/?query=charlie.uk&cc-num=#whois-result
.Don't be so melodramatic, the people you're talking about cared so much they
.
Sorry If I'm short here I'm just tired of saying the same things over and over
A registrant either has anywhere up until cancellation to renew (as is in the t&c) or they have nothing
A registration can't depend on some random person outside opinion on whether the registrant wants the domain or not
What's happened breaks the whole system, it breaks any trust you can have in the .uk namespace, it makes domains unusable
You have up until cancellation or you have nothing
@dropped.uk I received an email from nominet at 21:06 yesterday confirming they had completed the transfer. Does your system show a time when the TAG was changed to Namecheap?
You can try all you want to build this into a soap opera but the facts are that it involves a tiny number of names registered to people who hadn't bothered to renew them and most importantly has nothing whatsoever to do with you or anyone else on this forum.
You can try all you want to build this into a soap opera but the facts are that it involves a tiny number of names registered to people who hadn't bothered to renew them and most importantly has nothing whatsoever to do with you or anyone else on this forum.
Surely by your argument, the fact that they weren't renewed was none of your business? Or are you being a hypocrite?
I haven't got a clue what your point is? I couldn't give a shit who renewed, registered or stole what so long as it didn't affect me. My main gripes are people being accused of theft and group bullying of someone when you don't even have the facts of what happened.
@bensd
I don't have the exact time, but the tag change from YAYYAY to NAMECHEAP-INC was roughly between 21:45 and 22:30.
You've already said you didn't even know what Nominet's Terms are, your own states you will take ownership of a domain of one of your customers within 30 days of expiry. You aren't dishonest, but why should anyone take you seriously when you have already agreed you have no idea what you are talking about?
Why not address my point about the bullying of Susannah when people don't have the facts?
A great number of people on here are members of Nominet, so it has everything to do with them, given it affects the reputation of the .uk namespace, its operators and public opinion on those who are members.You can try all you want to build this into a soap opera but the facts are that it involves a tiny number of names registered to people who hadn't bothered to renew them and most importantly has nothing whatsoever to do with you or anyone else on this forum.
A great number of people on here are members of Nominet, so it has everything to do with them, given it affects the reputation of the .uk namespace, its operators and public opinion on those who are members.
maybe one of you oracles can show the evidence that she's lying?
Ok you could argue to the best of her knowledge it was bound over by the agreement of the co.uk holder but it doesn't appear she dealt with anyone but FastHosts? if she did why not clarify?
If you're proven to have given factually inaccurate information and then no clarification after is everyone else the bad guy for pointing that out and being sceptical?
I will repeat my comment made on the other thread about the news article:
Sadly for somebody normally so vocal, on this occasion silence speaks louder than words .