- Joined
- Apr 26, 2005
- Posts
- 7,410
- Reaction score
- 148
Hi Guys
I have a UDRP case to defend.
Is anyone aware of the legal precedent / previous UDRPs, which show domaining as a legitimate use.
The case that I wish to defend against is where I have registered a term years ago, where I thought up a generic "future tech" term with a view to either selling the domain or developing such a service myself. At the time I registered it, the complainant was not using the term, and it was only years later that they filed an international trademark.
I wish to prove that registering the generic term with a view to selling it was a legitimate activity at the time, given no intellectual property rights existed then. Is there a legal precedent of cases for this?
Thanks
I have a UDRP case to defend.
Is anyone aware of the legal precedent / previous UDRPs, which show domaining as a legitimate use.
The case that I wish to defend against is where I have registered a term years ago, where I thought up a generic "future tech" term with a view to either selling the domain or developing such a service myself. At the time I registered it, the complainant was not using the term, and it was only years later that they filed an international trademark.
I wish to prove that registering the generic term with a view to selling it was a legitimate activity at the time, given no intellectual property rights existed then. Is there a legal precedent of cases for this?
Thanks