Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every Acorn Domains feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

.UK Announced

On the last voting rights PDF that I managed to import into a database (not the most recent one, but the one before that) there are only 58 tags/registrars with more than 10,000 domains, and only ~20 with more than 50,000. With only 42 signatures, it seems unlikely you'll have 5%.

Lol, it seems even more unlikely you have access to my emails. 42 signatures is a quote from months back, we got those within 2-3 days of calling for an EGM. I was calling out the numbers of members asking for an EGM because at that point we were going under the old companies act when voting rights weren't a big issue, we just needed 10% of members or 10% of votes. However the companies act 2006 states now that 5% is needed, not 10%.

You haven't brought into account the 3% cap on voting rights, so can I suggest you a little bit more research before stating that it is likely or not that I'm telling the truth / accurate.

We have enough to go at any point, we have had that since about week 1-2.
 
I was just going off the quote on the previous page.

You haven't brought into account the 3% cap on voting rights

There are only about 10 members who exceed the voting rights cap (maybe less now with some of the mergers/acquisitions that have happened in the last 12 months).

so can I suggest you a little bit more research before stating that it is likely or not that I'm telling the truth / accurate

Was just pointing out the maths, not saying that you're not telling the truth.
 
Was just pointing out the maths, not saying that you're not telling the truth.

But to others mate who don't have the time to go into it all in detail. There is only two possibilities when reading your statement, a) it is unlikely I know what I am doing or b) I'm telling lies. So yep I was a little mythed tbh.

We've (more than me) been through it and we have the numbers to make this thing happen when needed.
 
Hi Mate,

We have around 8% of voting rights, we only need 5% to call an EGM and issue a written statement to all members. So the system is there should we need to call one.

The 5% goes on voting share, so how many names on one tag plays a massive part. You could in theory have 1000 members calling for an EGM and still not have enough. Or you could have just 2 members calling for one and have 6%.

Cheers
GW

Graeme, I know I have around a 1000 on one Nom tag, so I hope that helps.

This is a blatant attempt to raise funds to UK Gov plc, plus Registrars who may or may not sit on the board at Nominet, to grab whatever limited funds are left in the small business community and at the same time, rip-off domainers who historically have been a major source of Nominet's income. Its a further tax on beleaguered, cash-strapped businesses and investors in the UK who are suffering financially. It undermines the UK's primary domain and it adds huge costs to almost 10 million owners in a time of recession.

UK businesses and investors have spent billions developing their online businesses.

The security issue is nothing more than marketing spiel and will make no impact on cyber crime, all it does is to seek to reassure the new .uk is secure and everything else particularly the .co.uk is not and therefore worthless!

Whatever happened to the Nominet mantras of ".co.uk a great place to be" or 4 out of 5 prefer the .co.uk".

If this nonsensical offering, which was soundly beaten back in 2004 goes ahead then the .uk should be offered to the .co.uk owners FOC and should be backdated to when the .co.uk was purchased. Any new .uk's should or could be sold at the proposed £20 reg cost.

The .co.uk should be phased out completely but only when the new extension has parity on Google.

This is NOT an issue of trust. Consumers already "TRUST" the .co.uk and it is recognised Internationally. This devalues almost 20 years of the one country-specific url that bucks the .com trend.

This is not only a kick in the teeth for people on this site but for businesses who would have to completely rebrand their business. Does Nominet have "any idea" how much this costs, it could see many UK businesses go to the wall. They have no guarantee they'd even get the .uk if they don't have a trademark but hey they could go head-to-head in an auction with someone who has infinitely more funds and watch their businesses go bust in front of their eyes!

Or perhaps worse still, they could sit in front of their computers for hours/days hoping to secure their rightful domains only to find some cyber-squatter with software has bagged their domain within a nano-second of it becoming available and will come knocking on their door shortly to sell them it at a vastly inflated price?

Still lets look on the bright side, I don't suppose Amazon, Nominet, or the BBC will lose their .uk's, so that should make us all feel better!

The primary domain for the UK has already been sold and it CANNOT be sold again.

Where do I sign up?

.
 
Last edited:
Cheers Jimm, I think I took the form down by accident just before Christmas, I'll drop you a line shortly to put your name to the list.

Cheers
GW
 
7 days to go!

Happy New Year.

To make sure it is a good 2013 make sure you have posted your comments to Nominet on .uk proposal
http://www.nominet.org.uk/how-participate/policy-development/current-policy-discussions-and-consultations/consultation-new-uk

Or if you want to add additional comments please email them to [email protected]

Act now time is running out!

Last chance in 2012.

First chance of 2013 to tell Nominet what you think of their .uk proposal?

Happy New Year.
 
An eerie lull.

Anyone know of any new articles released since Christmas particularly anything from nominet ?
 
Some might be surprised that according to my latest business intelligence report from Nominet the November registration stats and renewal rates are little changed from previous months. No sign of any measurable effect caused by the .UK proposals there.

Stephen.
 
Some might be surprised that according to my latest business intelligence report from Nominet the November registration stats and renewal rates are little changed from previous months. No sign of any measurable effect caused by the .UK proposals there.

Stephen.


What did you expect for November.

If you think about it, not many people are aware that anything is going on, the co.uk consumer is being shafted without even being informed. Most consumers would not know who Nominet are and to read about it in the Telegraph to most it's like reading about quantum theory.
 
Up or Down?

Some might be surprised that according to my latest business intelligence report from Nominet the November registration stats and renewal rates are little changed from previous months. No sign of any measurable effect caused by the .UK proposals there.

Stephen.

Thanks for that,Yes I'm suprised.

Would you please post the actual figures?

I would expect a small downward effect on renewal rates even though only a few people know about it, but enough domainers are aware to make a small decrease and that is my backed up by experience of seeing domains on my watch lists not being renewed more than in the past.
 
It's too early to tell, because the people who are clued up on the potential changes may/may not have domains pending renewal and may well be waiting for further information to make a final decision.

For my own part, I've dropped .co.uk domains that I wouldn't buy the .uk for at the proposed £20 and retained those which I think justify the cost of owning both the .co.uk and .uk.

I think we'll also see a large number of drops as a result of google changes, so it will be difficult to distill one from the other.
 
Thanks for that,Yes I'm suprised.

Would you please post the actual figures?

I would expect a small downward effect on renewal rates even though only a few people know about it, but enough domainers are aware to make a small decrease and that is my backed up by experience of seeing domains on my watch lists not being renewed more than in the past.

I'm not sure if I am allowed to publish the exact figures as they come in a monthly report - if you are a registrar you can sign up to get them.

However what i think I can say is that renewal rates have been falling all year but the rate of decline in October and November is smaller than it was in earlier months during the year,

New registrations in November are higher than in every month since May, exceeded only by October!

I agree that I have seen more domains on lists that are not being renewed. It seems the secondary market is so small in terms of transactions that it is having little impact on the overall numbers.

Stephen.
 
To be honest I wouldn't read too much into these figures yet as few know of the impending brown storm.

If people were dropping names because of .uk, then they would have filled out the consultation. Only 650'ish have at the last count. So only around 650 owners would probably potential be dropping.

I'd love to see the renewals from those of us that know, as when this comes out and more people know that is when these figures become significant.
 
Some might be surprised that according to my latest business intelligence report from Nominet the November registration stats and renewal rates are little changed from previous months. No sign of any measurable effect caused by the .UK proposals there.

Stephen.

Sorry doesn't the BI hub (bi.nominet.org.uk) give data for activity on your own TAG only?
 

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members online

Premium Members

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
      There are no messages in the current room.
      Top Bottom