Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

Watch what you say...

Status
Not open for further replies.
Been,there seen it ,done it, got the t shirt, lost the t shirt etc etc. What you say is entirely correct, you just never know. You might think it paranoic but the authorities are constantly scanning forums like this for info .

DG
 
Hmm, interesting that he didn't include the ISP/Chat room host in the litigation on the basis that they became the publishers.
 
netserve said:
Hmm, interesting that he didn't include the ISP/Chat room host in the litigation on the basis that they became the publishers.

Yep, but might have been tactical ,i.e. if you include an ISP etc as defendant to your claim you know that they will at least initially defend it and have the cash/insurance to do so, whereas with "mrs bloggs" you can be sure they wont have the money to throw at it,

DG
 
Maybe they did a deal whereby they coughed up the IP address / identity of the poster and removed the material in return for not being "taken up the steps".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
      Helmuts @ HelmutsHelmuts is verified member.: Good morning all
      Top Bottom