Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every Acorn Domains feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

Good news!

Status
Not open for further replies.
So when is the 35-year-old suspect being released for "good behaviour" :)
 
Was laughing at this morning, ashame they don't all get that, I hope for a while Seans parents have a gleaming smile on their faces :p
 
We are not America. We don't have a death penalty in our country. It's hard to understand how you guys can perceive the disgraceful lapse in security that led to one thug murdering another thug as somehow a good thing.

P.
 
We are not America. We don't have a death penalty in our country. It's hard to understand how you guys can perceive the disgraceful lapse in security that led to one thug murdering another thug as somehow a good thing.

P.
It is rare that I agree with you, Philip, but I do agree with your sentiment.

OTOH the outcome of the enquiry into such cases is usually the determinand of what happened.

If someone, prisoner or officer, is found to be at fault, it is a "disgraceful lapse in security".

If no individual blame is attributed, a jury of his peers has found that the continued existence of the victim is an offence against society. It's a jungle in there ...
 
If no individual blame is attributed, a jury of his peers has found that the continued existence of the victim is an offence against society. It's a jungle in there ...

We do not allow prisoners the right to vote, let alone the right to decide whether another prisoner lives or dies. That is why this incident is an utter disgrace.

Regardless, it is distasteful to see the incident viewed as some kind of triumph of natural justice - when in fact the prison itself has failed to perform its legal purpose.

P.
 
Last edited:
Call me old fashioned, call me from last century... I don't mind... Honest...

And I am not going to be over humane either.

Child killers should be hanged. Full stop!
 
We do not allow prisoners the right to vote, let alone the right to decide whether another prisoner lives or dies.
P.

The law does not allow prisoners the right to vote. Nonetheless, they have opinions, and they have moral values. Because of the nature of his crimes, the victim in this case is a "classified nonce".
Perhaps if the other prisoners had the right to decide who they shared their environment with, his existence would be continuing in Broadmoor or Rampton - as recommended earlier in the documented evidence.

Say what you like, I don't think he's going to be missed. Like the few bob Doodle is placing on the roulette wheel as I write ...
 
I don't think he'll be missed. Certainly, I don't miss him. But that is not the point and I personally find the elation expressed here to be in poor taste.

P.
 
I say R.I.P Colin Hatch

Rest In Peices as the maggots munch on you scum :p

Ah yes, a typical doodlebug response. I do realise that it's a bad idea to get involved in these tasteless threads, it's just that I can't bear to see the stupidity go entirely unchallenged.

P.
 
Last edited:
From reading the article, what I find most depressing is that he was allowed out on bail to commit more crimes. The nature of his crimes should've triggered warning signs early on. Imagine losing a child in such a way, and then being told that the guy had a history of commiting such abuses.
 
History ...

There's a notorious paederast, quite rich - he is a builder - who is famously known as a dirty old man, but has never been sufficiently stupid to get caught. Chase him and his known associates and you could cleanse Europe of a lot of perverts. But it is all down to priorities ...
 
Shame they didn't cut his balls off first. Summary justice in rare instances like this is, IMO, justified. Hopefully it will make other scum like this think twice before they abuse their next victim.
 
I am 100% certain, that if filth like this were in the general population in prisons instead of being protected through segregation, that a lot of them would be able to control themselves and not commit the evil crimes in the first place.

If this guy had lived for another 50 years in prison it would cost the state at least £5m - when we have pensioners and WW2 veterans frightened to put the heating on in winter, there is something wrong with our priorities.
 
I am 100% certain, that if filth like this were in the general population in prisons instead of being protected through segregation, that a lot of them would be able to control themselves and not commit the evil crimes in the first place.

If this guy had lived for another 50 years in prison it would cost the state at least £5m - when we have pensioners and WW2 veterans frightened to put the heating on in winter, there is something wrong with our priorities.

Well said Brewsters :cool:

If these people knew they would get their head kicked in on a daily basis they would keep thier hands to theirselves.

And Phillip you're right, a typical Doodlebug response because typically I think anyone like Colin Hatch should put to death.

Humans have been around for approx 200,000 years , it's only the last 200 years or so that you havn't been allowed to kill someone in order to protect your family.

So who's right ? the people of 200 years or the people of 200,000 years ?
It's nature to protect your loved ones or seek revenge for someone harming them so the fact that someone else did it for them is good :cool:
 
Last edited:
If these people knew they would get their head kicked in on a daily basis they would keep thier hands to theirselves.

Untrue. U.S. jails have a terrible record of violence, but nevertheless they keep fillling.

And Phillip you're right, a typical Doodlebug response because typically I think anyone like Colin Hatch should put to death.

Perhaps they should be. But that is a matter of law, and we do not have the death penalty in this country. Therefore it cannot be considered a victory when our rubbish prisons allow one thug to murder another thug while in supposedly secure custody.

P.
 
Untrue. U.S. jails have a terrible record of violence, but nevertheless they keep fillling.
If I'm to be honest Phillip that did come to mind but I don't know how many child sex offenders get attacked in their system but yes you're right their prisons are violent and there are still child sex offenders.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Premium Members

Latest Comments

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
      There are no messages in the current room.
      Top Bottom