Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

Letter from company director

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Posts
372
Reaction score
38
Hi,

Yesterday I had a letter from a company director who had written to me by email saying that i should take my site down within 7 days as their site is trademarked.

Their business is trade marked for for a 3 word phrase.

Mine is a two word phrase. (The phrase is similar)

I'm operating in a similar business as theirs but its very relevant to my business.

I have never offered this name for sale to this company or anyone else.

The director then offered me £££ to buy my site.

Its a .co.uk

Fun and games now begin.

What are your thoughts ?
 
Hard to know without more specifics, though the fact he offered to buy it maybe suggests he's not sure where he stands either.
 
Hard to know without more specifics, though the fact he offered to buy it maybe suggests he's not sure where he stands either.

Yes i thought that. A single panelist will cost approx £1,100 , 3 panelists is approx £3,000

If claimant wants a single or three panel he pays for the costs including legal fees.

So i guess they don't want to pay the legal fees as it would probably cost them at the minimum £2,500
 
PM the domains and will provide guidance.

DRS is £750 plus VAT, time and legal fees (if you respond, £200 if not).
 
please do not take this as sound or solid legal advice, but everything you have said suggests that this company director has got it into his head that a scare tactic will make the sound of just buying the domain off you seem sweeter and a relief.

if it's a generic phrase and you are in competition, not cashing in or trying to build on their name, that's the end of that.
 
When was your domain registered and when was theirs registered?
That's the question, but also:

Which of the two starting trading first ?

Reasoning: the second comer should have known about the possible competitors, and refrained from using a name that could be construed as confusingly similar.
 
That's the question, but also:

Which of the two starting trading first ?

Reasoning: the second comer should have known about the possible competitors, and refrained from using a name that could be construed as confusingly similar.

Their domain name is different from my domain name left of the dot.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rule #1: Be Respectful

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Premium Members

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Lastest Listings

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Siusaidh AcornBot:
    Siusaidh has left the room.
      Siusaidh AcornBot: Siusaidh has left the room.
      Top Bottom