Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every Acorn Domains feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

The new catchers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 9, 2006
Posts
33
Reaction score
5
Have the famous female tagholders quickly managed to grasp the catching techniques or is it time to sign up Fido and squiggles?
 
sorry i'm missing your point!

You didn't appear to miss the point in the thread above. My point is perhaps Miss Oakey & co would like to come online and explain what DAC or Automaton does.
 
Im sure that some of them are perhaps girlfriends of renowned catchers, and they themselves have no real interest in domains. A neat way of getting around rules and to prove would be hard. Im not singling out anyone in particular but of course it is going on.

DG
 
i would have thought this is impossible to monitor if the requests are unlinked and from seperate IPs - if they have the time and money what can you do.

If you cant beat them ......... :D
 
I have not checked all their registrations however I would guess they are all opted out and using 123-reg or the like nameservers - ie. nothing identifiable.

What is going to be fun is to see where the registrations end up, the most comic of the female catchers was the very successful Miss S H B**** from a while ago, who picked up a few nice ones that have now moved on.

There was another post on here that a 'new tag' regged a three letter however deleted it soon after - perhaps the new tag / dac holders are not fully up with how things work and they accidently hit delete?

If Nominet made public which tags were linked it could show interesting patterns... likewise if anyone has been told off for erm, 'sharing' quotas :)

further to this:


Actually this unusual pattern of new tag holders caught our eye as well and so we were already investigating when complaints were received.

Your post has illustrated the bigger problem though, which is that we do not publish details of linked tags, so many people think they are getting away with it. This is something we are now considering changing.
__________________
Jay Daley
Nominet UK


Nom have had a look and found nothing fishy I assume?

With regards to the last point, are the details going to be published and if not why not?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Further to this domains mentioned in that previous thread are:

WHOIS Query - BENNET
WHOIS Query - BENNET
WHOIS Query - LORE - (this is the one that got deleted it seems unless deleting.co.uk gives duff info)

Perhaps someone could log / do occasional PRSS search and then compare in a few months time?


This is classic... just PRSSed 'Rebecca Oakey' ... guess where she is from... MILTON KEYNES! :)
 
All previous catches on the LORE tag that I've seen have since been transferred or deleted/reregged to this same individual - funny that! Not that I'm suggesting anything untoward is going on, obviously ;)

I agree that the linked Tags need to be shown somewhere on the nom site.

Dont think this thread will last long !!

Grant
 
Going back to the original batch of same surname female tags that suddenly appeared a while back, I'm sure Nominet must have looked into this and linked the tags, even with the limited info I have a quick seach on 192.com would seem to indicate 2 of the tags live together.

Can't see why Nominet would have any reason not to show linked tags, would maybe act as a deterrent to stop anyone who might decide to try and ignore the 'Anti Avoidance Clause'.

There you go admin no names mentioned :)
 
Could it be that the boys are regging in the wifes name for taxman reasons???
 
Could it be that the boys are regging in the wifes name for taxman reasons???


irespective of any 'tax reasons' Nominets rules on associated members - members not tags, though tags can be linked - are quite clear. Any connection results in an increased cumulative dac quota which is prohibited. Allocations would be amalgamated.

I'm all for Nominet publishing data... bit like ID cards, only those with something to hide would be nervous.

S
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members online

Premium Members

Latest Comments

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
      There are no messages in the current room.
      Top Bottom