texidriver said:Quote:
Originally Posted by Jac
Bollocks!
Jac
Careful texi.... you're showing a sense of humour... and that could definitely be dangerous when you've only got one brain cell.
Regards
James Conaghan
Welcome to AcornDomains.co.uk, a friendly community for UK domain investors, developers and anyone interested in domain names.
Whether you're looking to buy or sell domains, learn more about the UK domain market, get feedback on your names, or simply chat with other domainers, you're in the right place. AcornDomains has been bringing together people from across the UK domain industry for many years, from complete beginners to experienced investors.
Have a look around, join the discussions and, if you haven't already, create a free account and introduce yourself.
texidriver said:Quote:
Originally Posted by Jac
Bollocks!
Jac
Jac said:Oh, and I'm still having difficulty understanding why 99.46% of stakeholders have to pay even a penny more than they should because you think the rights of 0.53% of them are more important!
bb99 said:As a wise man I knew once said: "You're getting bogged down in the numbers".
bb99 said:The point, in my shitty opinion, is that domain transfers are a fundamental part of the registry function in the same way that registrations, cancellations, renewals, answering the telephone and going to the toilet are.
It is on that basis, and that alone, that registrant transfers should be free. That doesn't mean that they have to be free at the expense of security etc - I like the security and paperwork that Nominet's transfer process offers... I just think that it should come for free.
Domain transfers should be taken out of the same pot that pays for Jay Daley's tea bags, JAC's PAB expenses and the nice member lunches that they have occasionally. End of*.
Now I have 101 other reasons why domain transfer fees are bad, but I've said it all before and I can't be bothered to repeat myself.
aqls said:Though it's probably best given to someone else to present to the executives, given JAC's reluctance to give domainers fair due and a decent weighting amongst all the other stakeholders he has to serve.
It is hard enough for them to accept that we contribute double figures percentage to Nominet's income.
We need someone to champion our cause, not dismiss everything as too much of a change from the status quo.
-aqls-
aqls said:Though it's probably best given to someone else to present to the executives, given JAC's reluctance to give domainers fair due and a decent weighting amongst all the other stakeholders he has to serve.
It is hard enough for them to accept that we contribute double figures percentage to Nominet's income.
We need someone to champion our cause, not dismiss everything as too much of a change from the status quo.
-aqls-
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.