Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. Share your own thoughts and experience, accounts may be terminated for violations.
-
Welcome to AcornDomains.co.uk, a friendly community for UK domain investors, developers and anyone interested in domain names.
Whether you're looking to buy or sell domains, learn more about the UK domain market, get feedback on your names, or simply chat with other domainers, you're in the right place. AcornDomains has been bringing together people from across the UK domain industry for many years, from complete beginners to experienced investors.
Have a look around, join the discussions and, if you haven't already, create a free account and introduce yourself.
Windows 7
- Thread starter Dean
- Start date
- Status
yes win 7 uses 1,8287373332003093,8378383883833 of ram to start and vista uses 3,834838947397483783,39878374837483 of ram to start and a week in spain while it gets past boot screen... 
we have both, on a serious point 7 is faster... but as they are both based on windows 2000 (the best!) with crap added they will always be slow!
lets hope the final 7 is better than the beta...
we have both, on a serious point 7 is faster... but as they are both based on windows 2000 (the best!) with crap added they will always be slow!
lets hope the final 7 is better than the beta...
- Joined
- May 23, 2007
- Posts
- 871
- Reaction score
- 15
yup, running on my laptop. Seems faster than Vista on the same machine, and just seems to feel right, where Vista felt wrong. I like it. Runs everything I've tried so far.
Lappy is a fairly old Tosh M200 tablet, with a 166MHz Centrino, 768Mb RAM and a 60Gb drive
Lappy is a fairly old Tosh M200 tablet, with a 166MHz Centrino, 768Mb RAM and a 60Gb drive
- Status
Similar threads
