Bin Laden: Shoot To Kill

[BREWSTERS]

You asked me for evidence backing up my beliefs. The difference between the NIST report and the one you point to is that their remit wasn't to write a report that had proving foul play by the US government at its core.

Didn't read it did you.

What I pointed to shows the failings of the NIST report.

 

[mat]

So what you’re telling us is the US government had any building/area in the USA to target, but they picked 2 buildings with a method that was factually flawed from the start?

 

[BREWSTERS]

Ah, the insult stage.

Saying you're grasping at straws is an insult...dear me. But it's ok for you to mock is it? (post #46).

I'm off to bed now, night all.

 

[mat]

Not going to answer my question?

 

[BREWSTERS]

It's nothing more than rhetoric and supposition and unlike the NIST report there's no scientific evidence, no independent metallurgical tests etc..

What it does do is point out the flaws in the NIST report that makes any conclusion from that report invalid; stuff like their incorrect assement of temperatures; where they even ignore their own findings and instead use made up figures in their models, etc. Not supposition.

 

[BREWSTERS]

Thats a bit of a half arsed answer Brewsters.

Im asking why would they use a method that is known as a fact not to be possible?

Because they don't need to convince everybody, just most.

Its also worth noting that they didnt have to use those buildings...

It made sense to use them. Silverstein was in on it - he made a tidy $4b profit from them. They were outdated and needed a lot of work - so much work that they would not have been profitable as they were. Didn't stop Silverstein bidding to get the lease though.

 

[mat]

They could have picked any building in the USA to fly their planes into and they picked the darn ones that can’t be taken down by planes and to top it all off they accidently picked a family friends son as the person who did it. What a stroke of bad luck!

 

[BREWSTERS]

With no evidence or metallurgical tests.

What's better, a report backed up by scientific fact or one based purely on theory and supposition?

Sean, you haven't read the report or the response, otherwise you could not make that statement with a straight face. The official report is not backed up by scientific fact - their figures are wrong...that's the point.

 

[BREWSTERS]

They could have picked any building in the USA to fly their planes into and they picked the darn ones that can’t be taken down by planes and to top it all off they accidently picked a family friends son as the person who did it. What a stroke of bad luck!

No skyscrapers built over the last 50 years should be able to collapse from a plane strike - not just those ones (I haven't even got to WTC7 yet - no plane - just the big bad wolf and a shedload of explosives).

Really am off now.

 

[mat]

That just backs up my point even more.

If it is the case that no skyscrapers built over the last 50 years should be able to collapse from a plane strike. Why the bloody hell would they use planes

 

[anthony]

Brewsters, for a conspiracy you must have conspirators, so i say again, please provide the hard evidence of these conspirators carrying out this deed, try going beyond the copious links to bollocks and pictures. Or is that too much to expect from all the thousands of experts and theorists?

 

[crazihos]

Personally I it insulting when they expect us to believe that a bunch of goat herders were responsible.

I find the above quite offensive, "goat herders" as you call them managed to inspire or possibly even order 7/7 killing loads of innocent Brits. Madrid was inspired by goat herders and the fuck ups in Scotland, i think that was inspired by goat herders too.

These "goat herders" as you call them are very well educated and very well funded, have access to the internet so can spread their ideology without constraint and have hundreds of bored, impressionable young boys waiting to listen to their rhetoric.

Whatever your opinion on what happened I find your description of the people 99.9% of people find responsible, distasteful for a number of reasons!

 

[viceroy]

I reckon it was the queen...

 

[SF]

What do you think about Roswell new mexico 1947?

 

[anthony]

What do you think about Roswell new mexico 1947?

Now we all know Ant & Dec had something to do with that, I've seen it on the telly!

 

[SF]

It was a good film that they showed it a few weeks back on freview HD

Thought it was alright...

 

[SF]

Can you watch this and Debunk it for me..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZipbgXOJoc

 

[retired_member33]

Sick and tired of all this 9/11 crap, worse things happened in history and to be very honest, the yanks asked for it.

Thinking that they are the superpower which can decide on what is wrong or right and simply attacking countries just because they think a country isn't doing things right in their point of view and trying to get other countries to join them in their war which in the end is all about money.

The world could have been so much better if we didn't listen to those yanks and just stuck to our point of view, but unfortunally money talks...

 

[GreyWing]

Sick and tired of all this 9/11 crap, worse things happened in history and to be very honest, the yanks asked for it.

Yep those dam yanks going about their daily lives, doing a job to feed their kids, burn alive a-holes

Thinking that they are the superpower which can decide on what is wrong or right and simply attacking countries just because they think a country isn't doing things right in their point of view and trying to get other countries to join them in their war which in the end is all about money.

I see your point now, the world could have been a lot better if they hadn't help clear the Germans out of your country by sacrificing their young.

As far as I know places like Holland weren't swimming in oil or cash in the 1940's, only tulips and forgive me but we haven't had a run on Tulips since the mid 1600's.

 

[BREWSTERS]

That just backs up my point even more.

If it is the case that no skyscrapers built over the last 50 years should be able to collapse from a plane strike. Why the bloody hell would they use planes

Well it worked on you didn't it? You believe it despite all the evidence.