Those votes rights to what's in my account are out significantly.
Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.
EGM - What happened?
- Thread starter monaghan
- Start date
Those votes rights to what's in my account are out significantly.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2009
- Posts
- 374
- Reaction score
- 8
Your voting rights are not the same as how many domains you have in your account.
Voting rights are aggregated by adding two calculations together:
25% of the votes shall be distributed equally amongst the membership
75% of the votes allocated shall be distributed in relation to the number of paid-for domains
Okay then. Thanks.
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2009
- Posts
- 374
- Reaction score
- 8
There's actually quite a complicated formula applied to work out the voting rights which was designed so that the likes of GoDaddy with their 3.5 million domains don't have too much voting power against most of the little fishes like us.
Nominet Voting Rights
Having said that, I must be missing something because the voting rights declared by Nominet do not look right to me either.
Nominet's EGM page has a link to "the voting rights for the 2021 EGM" which is a PDF which states GoGaddy voting rights are 3,572,543 ... I thought the maximum votes that anyone should have would be around 10% of that figure, perhaps someone here can explain the discrepancy?
I was all for the publicbenefit movememnt but I disagree in some part with the pricing issue, for the general public the cost of a uk registration is small and not really an issue, but for domainers sitting on 1000's of domains yes its a big issue. I myself would rather pay a few extra £ if I knew the proceeds would go to charity.
Maybe they should increase the wholesale price to £10.00 so domainers would have to release some of the domains giving the public a better chance at them.
It's not about the cost of the domain at point of registration, if it costs £10 to register, then it's fair to charge £10, however, each price rise has just resulted in larger pots of cash sloshing about in Nominet leaving a not for profit organization with a huge pot of cash to dispose of. As I've posted before, it's not down to Nominet to collect for charity, charitable giving is an optional decision based on personal beliefs and values, when it becomes compulsory, it's no longer charity.
The wholesale price needs to come down for the simple reason that Nominet's purpose is to administer a digital national resource (.uk domains) as cheaply and efficiently as possible for the benefit of the UK. This means UK businesses and individuals and the membership is of particular significance because it is comprised largely of those UK businesses and individuals closely connected with the Internet community and industry so it is right that they should help keep Nominet on course to do their duty as custodian of the national resource.
Nominet are there not to benefit themselves, but to provide a service to the UK economy and UK population, rather like the Highways Agency, hence it is right that they should be strictly non-profit. But in the last decade both former CEOs have usurped this noble purpose for their own misguided empire-building ambitions (which rather tellingly have invariably been failures) and to justify ever more greedy pay rises for themselves. They were not running a FTSE500 company (wouldn't last long in one with all those failures!), they were entrusted to manage a national resource and relentlessly trying to profit from it as though the resource belonged to them at the members' and public's expense constitutes a abuse of their position.
We Nominet members have an important role to play because our automatic right to wholesale prices ensures a layer of intense competition just above the registry level, which would be a pure monopoly without that. Nominet's leadership have been behaving as though they are a pure monopoly in recent years to the point of ignoring the membership (and hence the Internet community at large) and acting against their interests. But enough is enough and now, disgraced, they will hopefully have the sense to realise that their inappropriate management of the national resource and arrogant attitude to the membership was nurturing the seeds of their own demise.
We members also help to make the industry more efficient by having a fluid aftermarket for registered domains and this is kept as efficient as possible by having prices as low as possible so we are willing to take more risks. Investing £thousands in a premium domain would be far more risky if it were not fairly easy to resell it again in the aftermarket - maybe at a profit, maybe at a loss - but at least you are sure to get a significant chunk of your capital back. It is the aftermarket that ensures that, and that is comprised predominantly of Nominet members.
Please let's hear no more of this £10 nonsense. 99% of members (and the public) want prices to go down. We need to reverse the aftermath of the last decade's bad leadership and reduce prices down to Nominet pre-profiteering levels, not increase them. Now all our energies should be focused on holding Nominet to account and getting a commitment from them to run the registry as a non-profit organisation as they should, not to enable them to profiteer even more, that's absurd!
Nominet are there not to benefit themselves, but to provide a service to the UK economy and UK population, rather like the Highways Agency, hence it is right that they should be strictly non-profit. But in the last decade both former CEOs have usurped this noble purpose for their own misguided empire-building ambitions (which rather tellingly have invariably been failures) and to justify ever more greedy pay rises for themselves. They were not running a FTSE500 company (wouldn't last long in one with all those failures!), they were entrusted to manage a national resource and relentlessly trying to profit from it as though the resource belonged to them at the members' and public's expense constitutes a abuse of their position.
We Nominet members have an important role to play because our automatic right to wholesale prices ensures a layer of intense competition just above the registry level, which would be a pure monopoly without that. Nominet's leadership have been behaving as though they are a pure monopoly in recent years to the point of ignoring the membership (and hence the Internet community at large) and acting against their interests. But enough is enough and now, disgraced, they will hopefully have the sense to realise that their inappropriate management of the national resource and arrogant attitude to the membership was nurturing the seeds of their own demise.
We members also help to make the industry more efficient by having a fluid aftermarket for registered domains and this is kept as efficient as possible by having prices as low as possible so we are willing to take more risks. Investing £thousands in a premium domain would be far more risky if it were not fairly easy to resell it again in the aftermarket - maybe at a profit, maybe at a loss - but at least you are sure to get a significant chunk of your capital back. It is the aftermarket that ensures that, and that is comprised predominantly of Nominet members.
Please let's hear no more of this £10 nonsense. 99% of members (and the public) want prices to go down. We need to reverse the aftermath of the last decade's bad leadership and reduce prices down to Nominet pre-profiteering levels, not increase them. Now all our energies should be focused on holding Nominet to account and getting a commitment from them to run the registry as a non-profit organisation as they should, not to enable them to profiteer even more, that's absurd!
It's a shame the board had so little faith in their employees ability to continue to run the shop after their departure, seems the board were as critical of the staff as they were about the members.
