Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. Share your own thoughts and experience, accounts may be terminated for violations.
  • Welcome to AcornDomains.co.uk, a friendly community for UK domain investors, developers and anyone interested in domain names.

    Whether you're looking to buy or sell domains, learn more about the UK domain market, get feedback on your names, or simply chat with other domainers, you're in the right place. AcornDomains has been bringing together people from across the UK domain industry for many years, from complete beginners to experienced investors.

    Have a look around, join the discussions and, if you haven't already, create a free account and introduce yourself.

Giving domains a value

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Posts
11
Reaction score
0
Is there anywhere apart from dnscoop where you can get a rough value for a domain if you were to sell it?
Thanks :)
 
Is there anywhere apart from dnscoop where you can get a rough value for a domain if you were to sell it?
Thanks :)

Automated tools are useless when it comes to valuing names as there are big holes in the software, DNScoop weights towards age far too much:

The estimated value of http://www.mega.co.uk is: $210

etc.

Personally I would suggest trawling forums , sales threads and networking to discover real market data and then value sales and purchases accordingly.
 
Yeah agreed with rob, i would never use a automated tool to value a name.

Chris- spot on with valuation, mega.co.uk will not be going anywhere for anyless than that - its got to much potential.

When it does, I will be having one heck of a party :)
 
Yeah agreed with rob, i would never use a automated tool to value a name.

Chris- spot on with valuation, mega.co.uk will not be going anywhere for anyless than that - its got to much potential.

When it does, I will be having one heck of a party :)

well why have you parked it? and not working on developing it.
 
Funny you should say that, but I am just testing the traffic, its had about 40 type ins and 2/3 clicks which are high infact those 3 clicks have now paid for the fee £5 :)

I would like to develop it, but it would need to be done properly bit like fly co.uk :) not!..... :)
 
Interesting valuation on jea.co.uk

Guys

Ran a catch from a couple of days past the tool at domstatic (I put down it had been regged for 10) valuation of US $22K on Jea.co.uk - any offer by PM will be accepted for around this figure.

Best Regards


JohnP
 
Cool, £7.5k for my 4 letter .co.uk, which has no trademark brand, not associated with a product, not a word, just letters, so not bad. Shame i ain't selling :D
 
hmmm,

I think on the Intent and commercality you may have slightly over estimated. :mrgreen:

Because you have 'branded' iow to become 'isle of man' it does not reaLLY mean you can factor that in as higly when valuing the domain 'as is'.

So I would assume that IsleOfMan.co.uk would have greater clarity and intent than iow - although i much prefer iow as a domain as its more elegant.

if it was job,co,uk then yes the meaning is pretty much 100% clear to most people. anyway i need to think abt this more...:mrgreen:


iow

Domain Score:
Total: 77.25%

Domains Potential Value:
£200,000+

:)
 
Julians tool is definitely on the right path. So much better than any of the others. At the end of the day you are never going to be able to a get a system like that perfect without Human thought being involved in the apraisal.

I think its more down to people being honest when they appraise. Ofcourse you are wanting it to give you a high value but what good is that to you when its not even close to being accurate??
 
actully you are a bit wrong there, a few top end domains have sold near to a domtastic valuation:

fly
mobile etc

however exceptional domains are easy to value than good or average for obvious reasons.

No................
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom