Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. 🚫 No AI-generated (LLM) posts allowed. Share your own thoughts and experience — accounts may be terminated for violations.

Interesting

Status
Not open for further replies.
...A good news story, with what I see as a sensible common sense outcome.

Lets hope we see more of these kind of results, both in UDRP and DRS cases!

Regards,

Sneezy.
 
judges judge humanity

Indeed, judges judge us human beings.. What they do is judge whether what one human does to another is unfair. Judging does not need a legal background, judging needs an ability to understand humans. DRS experts have got so screwed up in legalities that they can't see consumerism and don't understand the human motivation to buy and sell....

Simple things are simple things....a legal person can quote any act they so wish but at the end of the day common sense has to prevail OR humand kind fails.

Acts of parliamnet can only guide, what is important is the relative hurt caused by ones actions:-

If Virgin claim a right to virgintv then that must be down to some hot headed ego driven individual who can't see his bit from his other bit....thus at the end of the day ego will turn...rights are rigths and common sense must be prevail unlike EURID's assertion.

Long live humans...lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rule #1: Be Respectful

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Premium Members

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Lastest Listings

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
  • Siusaidh AcornBot:
    Siusaidh has left the room.
      Siusaidh AcornBot: Siusaidh has left the room.
      Top Bottom