Membership is FREE – with unlimited access to all features, tools, and discussions. Premium accounts get benefits like banner ads and newsletter exposure. ✅ Signature links are now free for all. Share your own thoughts and experience, accounts may be terminated for violations.
  • Welcome to AcornDomains.co.uk, a friendly community for UK domain investors, developers and anyone interested in domain names.

    Whether you're looking to buy or sell domains, learn more about the UK domain market, get feedback on your names, or simply chat with other domainers, you're in the right place. AcornDomains has been bringing together people from across the UK domain industry for many years, from complete beginners to experienced investors.

    Have a look around, join the discussions and, if you haven't already, create a free account and introduce yourself.

Nominet Nominet IDN Sub-committee

Status
Not open for further replies.

Whois-SearchWhois-Search is verified member.

Nominet Member
Nominet Registrar
Joined
Dec 25, 2004
Posts
1,961
Reaction score
375
The IDN Sub-committee met in London on 18th December. Following lengthy debate we unanimously agreed a compromise based on the introduction of IDN over two phased sunrise periods, as follows.......

http://www.nic.uk/digitalAssets/10797_IDN_Sub_recommendations.pdf

What does non-welsh diacritical variants mean?

Is that like non-english, non-gaelic, non-urdu, non-arabic? :D
 
Although I am no linguistic expert, I believe the following letters are examples of diacritical variants not found in the Welsh language Ç Ĺ Ļ .

Diacritical variants found in the Welsh language cover the variants used in Gaelic, so there was no need to make a separate policy statement for Gaelic.

I hope this clarifies things.

-Subhi
(Elected PAB member)
 
From the Jan PAB Report:

9. Feedback from the IDN subcommittee
Eric Ramage introduced the formal recommendations from the IDN subcommittee and mentioned that Clive Feather had circulated another paper to the PAB mailing list covering the technical issues which the subcommittee had been unable to agree on. Clive Feather explained his paper was not the meeting report, but offered background for those who were interested.

Resolution

The PAB resolved to accept the recommendations set out in the report of the IDN subcommittee.

http://www.nic.uk/digitalAssets/11741_Jan_2007_PAB_report.pdf
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom