Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every Acorn Domains feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

Screen resolution & widescreen format...

What is your screen resolution? Choose one or more

  • Standard 1024x768

    Votes: 2 10.0%
  • Widescreen 1152x864

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Widescreen 1280x768/800

    Votes: 5 25.0%
  • Standard 1280x1024

    Votes: 4 20.0%
  • Widescreen 1440x900

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Widescreen 1600x200

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other: higher

    Votes: 11 55.0%
  • Other: lower

    Votes: 1 5.0%

  • Total voters
    20
Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 1, 2004
Posts
3,394
Reaction score
64
Hi All

I'm wondering what screen resolutions, and particularly whether widescreen/standard formats you are al using on your pc & laptops.

For years it's all been whether 800x600 or 1024x768. That was fine for 15.4" laptops etc but it has changed a lot in the last couple of years with a move to 17"+ standard laptop screens & 19-21" monitors.

After doing mainly backend systems for a while I'm now doing both. While 1024 seems standard for development it often leads to whacky results when floating divs unless the body container is fixed.

S
 
pretty rare for 800x600 thesedays... though I'm not sure what resolution netbooks & 11-14" screens use.
 
2 x 1280 by 1024 (primary & secondary) on my Office PC which is the day-to-day dev machine

plus:
1 x 1920 by 1080 PC to LCD HD TV
1 x 1440 x 900 Laptop
 
Last edited:
The day to day machines on my desk:
1 x 1920x1200 (mac)
1 x 1600x1200 (pc)
1 x 1280x1024 + 1 x 1280x768 second screen (pc)
1 x 1400x1050 (laptop)
 
pretty big ;-) Kind of in a corner of the room; it goes: 1 x 24" widescreen, 1 x17", 1x 24" widesecreen, 1 x21", 1x14" laptop (it's a tablet swivelled into A4 orientation)
 
This is a thread that needs Mr Bowlers input :)
 
This is a thread that needs Mr Bowlers input :)

;)

Never liked widescreen on desktop, will get the calculator out.

1600 by 1200 times 6 is 4800 x 2400

I'm on 800 x 600 on this desktop, not sure what the laptop is, hardly ever use it.

Dang I run higher res then that on my phone ;)
 
If your building a front end the de facto for fixed width at the moment appears to be ~960px, mainly because it divides nicely for 12/16/24 column layouts and fits on a screen 1024px wide.

Regarding issues with positioning for fixed width layouts it might be worth using a css framework to take some of the pain away:

Blueprint: A CSS Framework | Spend your time innovating, not replicating
960 Grid System
YUI 2: Grids CSS

I've used all three in client applications (particularly liking 960 ATM) and recommend giving them a shot if your going to be involved in more front-end work.

yui and 960 also support fluid grids (not sure on blueprint) which have minimum widths but stretch for wider resolutions if you want/need to cater for larger resolutions.
 
If your building a front end the de facto for fixed width at the moment appears to be ~960px, mainly because it divides nicely for 12/16/24 column layouts and fits on a screen 1024px wide.

Regarding issues with positioning for fixed width layouts it might be worth using a css framework to take some of the pain away:

Blueprint: A CSS Framework | Spend your time innovating, not replicating
960 Grid System
YUI 2: Grids CSS

I've used all three in client applications (particularly liking 960 ATM) and recommend giving them a shot if your going to be involved in more front-end work.

yui and 960 also support fluid grids (not sure on blueprint) which have minimum widths but stretch for wider resolutions if you want/need to cater for larger resolutions.

The 960 figure is one I sort of found for myself - it fits the standard 15.4" 1024 width - along with variants depending on padding & margin as well as the 1/3 2/3 rules that photographers use for creating visual balance. I'll have a look at the links though.

S
 
1920 x 1200
and
1280 x 1024 here
 
960 or 990 are the widths I work to at the mo.
 
Prior to that I ran 1600 x 1200 on a single 22" CRT, which weighed a tonne and have now given to a relative, which I bought in early 2001.

So whilst high resolutions are common these days, I wonder how many of you have been running 1600 x 1200 or higher for as long as I have. :) :)

Me, me, me! :D

Mine was a Mitsubishi Diamond and was just enormous but a great display until it went bang.

Now my setup is similar to stevebrowne (and yes I've got a big desk!)

2 x 1680x1050
2 x 1280x1024
1 x 1280x800 (laptop)

Is this turning into a who's got the biggest willy contest? ;)
 

Attachments

  • my-office-3.jpg
    my-office-3.jpg
    39.4 KB · Views: 70
I have just one monitor 1920 x 1200.

I tend to set site widths at around 990-1000px

If you are redesigning a site then a look what the stats to see what current users are using will give you some insight.
 
I have a big payment due at some point, and will be getting a decent multi-screened beast. Probably not that big though!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members online

No members online now.

Premium Members

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
      There are no messages in the current room.
      Top Bottom