20i Domains

The Case for Growth

Discussion in 'Nominet General Information' started by Acorn Newsbot, Feb 25, 2021.

  1. Acorn Newsbot

    Acorn Newsbot Junior Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2006
    Posts:
    22,068
    Likes Received:
    36
    On Monday, we issued the formal notice for an EGM to vote on a proposed resolution that would remove half of our board, including the entire executive team, without a workable alternative.

    While there are a number of issues at play in this debate, there is one that cuts across all of them: the question of growth. Should Nominet focus solely on managing .UK, confining itself to a one-dimensional existence? Or should it grow?

    Through careful study and consideration over many years, one Nominet board after another has consistently and unanimously determined that Nominet should aim to grow, and to do so in a way that does not compete with our members. The 2015 Lyons Report recognised both that a diversification strategy was consistent with Nominet’s founding principles and important to ensuring our future. Further, to address concerns from members, it suggested a competitive impact test should be used to evaluate new business opportunities so that we avoided competing with members. The board adopted this recommendation and has considered growth a priority ever since.

    Why do we need to grow?

    Without growth, we can’t continue to expand our public benefit contributions that are helping to address some of the most important digital issues facing young people today. This year we have committed £4 million, and we are targeting contribution levels of 10% of revenue in the future. But without growth, that amount will eventually stagnate.

    The .UK namespace remains strong, but we operate in a mature and crowded market. While registrations have increased during the pandemic, that bucks the underlying trend, and we don’t know how long the bounce will last.

    Finding new opportunities in the registry business is increasingly hard, not least because we are naturally constricted by our commitment to work with, rather than compete with, members.

    Without long-term growth, the ability we have to invest in the myriad of ways we support our members, for example keeping .UK prominent in an increasingly crowded marketplace, will decline over time.

    Without growth, we can’t innovate, and innovation is essential if we are to be ready for new technologies and emerging threats.

    Without growth and innovation, we can’t keep our vital staff who connect more than 10 million .UK domains and maintain our service without disruption or downtime.

    Our amazing team have valuable, much sought after skills. To keep them – and attract new talent – we have to compensate them fairly, in line with the market. And our competitors for staff are the likes of Google and Facebook, plus every start-up in and around London. So we need to grow to cover those ever-increasing costs.

    We also need to give them space to develop their skills and grow in their professional lives. That means giving them the opportunity and environment to explore new ideas and to innovate.

    Most recently, our commitment to innovation yielded breakthroughs on DNS security innovation that protect networks from malware — ideas that were a direct extension of our core competency. Recognised by the UK Government, Nominet now operates some of the most advanced DNS defence technology in the world and was selected by the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) to protect the UK Government.

    Recently the NCSC extended Nominet’s protection, already in operation across 700 government bodies, to cover the National Health Service. Nominet also developed a ‘Digital Roaming’ application, which protects public sector workers who are working remotely. Overall, more than 2.8 million public sector workers are now covered by our technology.

    We think all of this progress is good for Nominet and for our members.

    We are now 40% below .com price levels. Growth means we will ultimately be able hold prices down in future.

    It means we can invest in the infrastructure and protecting against new threats. We will invest £20 million in the .UK registry over the next three years.

    It means we have a stable base to keep growing, to keep pursuing opportunities that build on our expertise, and doing that alongside an unstinting focus on our core .UK business.

    We believe that a responsible strategy that includes some growth is a prudent way forward. But we also acknowledge our members have a range of views. It is a topic that clearly requires careful thought and greater dialogue in the near future.

    It’s vital that we find the common ground to set us up for success in the years ahead.

    By contrast, the EGM proposal to remove half the board threatens Nominet’s short-term stability and long-term health.

    We hope that you will join us in voting no on the proposed EGM resolution and keeping Nominet on the right track.

    The post The Case for Growth appeared first on Nominet.

    Continue reading...
     
  2. Domain Forum

    Acorn Domains Elite Member

    Joined:
    1999
    Messages:
    Many
    Likes Received:
    Lots
    articles.co.uk
     
  3. Siusaidh

    Siusaidh Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2019
    Posts:
    969
    Likes Received:
    342
    Once again, just not true.

    The idea that Nominet should grow 'because that way we will have more money to give to charities' is not going to convince members. They want Nominet to do what it was tasked to: run a Domain Registry. Nominet can give to charitable causes, proportionate to whatever it makes. But that's not what it's 'for'. If it's so important, why did they shift money, from donations, to large executive pay increases? Some members prefer to do their charitable giving themselves. Either way, Nominet is meant to be a domain name business.

    As for the threat to stability: why do the Chairman and CEO think that they are the only people who could run Nominet well. Over 350 of the most informed and involved members of Nominet think they have not run Nominet well. Moreover, Sir Michael Lyons actually has more career experience of running larger companies than Nominet. It's frankly insulting to suggest that he couldn't run Nominet well.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  4. martin-s United Kingdom

    martin-s Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2012
    Posts:
    3,447
    Likes Received:
    255
    Even if this was a valid argument (I'm not convinced), I'd like to know which growth projects are profitable? Show us the money Nominet!
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. Siusaidh

    Siusaidh Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2019
    Posts:
    969
    Likes Received:
    342
    But do members TRUST the current leadership to really mean what they say, or, really, does the CEO just see 'listening' to members (in this new-found born-again fervour since shutting down the forum) as a PR box to be ticked, while he just ploughs on investing in more autonomous vehicles, and other casino punts.

    If he wanted 'greater dialogue' why did he go full macho at the AGM and melodramatically shut down the members' forum right in the middle of the meeting.

    The real problem is TRUST. And I think the boat has sailed on that one.
     
  6. Ben Thomas

    Ben Thomas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2018
    Posts:
    1,796
    Likes Received:
    231
    Sick of hearing from them now. It's really boring. Roll on the vote and they'd be wise to shut up, since statistically speaking, every time a new email is sent out PublicBenefit.uk gets a nice boost in traffic (and support).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. xdnet

    xdnet Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2013
    Posts:
    47
    Likes Received:
    11
    I'm continually baffled by the level of contempt for members with these posts coming out from Nominet.

    "This year we have committed £4 million, and we are targeting contribution levels of 10% of revenue in the future. But without growth, that amount will eventually stagnate."

    Like we can't check the data and see quire clearly that £4M is nothing special compared to historic spending, and 10% of revenue would still be on the low end for historic public benefit spending?... but the reason they need all this diversification is GROWTH! - Well they've been diversifying for nearly a decade now and Public Benefit spending has only gone down.

    Hopefully they'll realise soon the members are not mushrooms.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. keano United Kingdom

    keano Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2004
    Posts:
    75
    Likes Received:
    11
    With all this talk of registry monetisation and Nominet with a foray into DNS services lets hope they don't go down the road of registry level wildcard DNS - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Site_Finder

    I remember it from when Verisign tried it many years ago. Wasn't pretty.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  9. LCHappy United Kingdom

    LCHappy Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2018
    Posts:
    288
    Likes Received:
    58
    The CEO says that growth is good and argues positively for it. Let's put to one side the rights and wrong of that. Arguing that growth is good does not equal delivering growth.

    How has Nominet grown over the last 6 years?
     
  10. ian

    ian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2008
    Posts:
    4,082
    Likes Received:
    303
    It hasn't, not really! They made a pretty penny from the release of the .uk not many wanted, and they took away their sizeable contributions to charities. The balance sheet has grown and the board paid accordingly. The board are the exact opposite of Robin Hood!