Membership is FREE, giving all registered users unlimited access to every Acorn Domains feature, resource, and tool! Optional membership upgrades unlock exclusive benefits like profile signatures with links, banner placements, appearances in the weekly newsletter, and much more - customized to your membership level!

Wikileaks pulled!

Status
Not open for further replies.
An aeroplane is designed to be as light as possible and uses aluminium and composites in it's construction. It isn't designed as a weapon so when it hits a super reinforced concrete structure like the Pentagon at 500+ MPH it literally collapses and disintegrates, the wings full of fuel are folded back and explode etc..

That's exactly what I thought...but you put it much more eloquently than me:)
 
An aeroplane is designed to be as light as possible and uses aluminium and composites in it's construction. It isn't designed as a weapon so when it hits a super reinforced concrete structure like the Pentagon at 500+ MPH it literally collapses and disintegrates, the wings full of fuel are folded back and explode etc..


Like this? This one atomises

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QOP4O_8dtc


.
 
Grassy knolls are now illegal in America... All grassy knoll owners must change the name to turfed mounds.
 
I wouldn't want to speculate what caused the damage, it's anyone's guess. All I'm saying is 124 ft wide planes don't fit into 65 ft holes!

Bomb?, Missile? why not a plane, jeez if they were actually a conspiracy on it why not just make a plane unmanned, that isn't hard to do. They do it on crash landing tests everyday. Why go to all that trouble of letting everyone see this missle flying across washinton. Remember missiles have a big orange jet of gas coming out the back end of it, so wouldn't be hard to spot.

Oh, but but 124ft planes do make 65ft holes, here is a 40ft one making a 5ft hole.

http://www.stupidvideos.com/video/stunts/Concrete_vs_plane/#43060
 
nt_hole3c.jpg


No what I meant was look at the picture, you can see the tip of one of the wings, then the hole where the fuseagle is but the other wing is not where it should be. There is no damage from the second wing in that picture.

Yet we know for a fact a plane went in there.

Yes, you can see where the left wing went. Consider the angle of the wings; they aren't flat, they make a shallow 'v'. It is clear where the left wing was - some debris has fallen to slightly blur the shape, but it is evident.
 
You should ask yourself this.... If it was an inside job or a setup, wouldnt they make the hole look more like a plane has hit it? They would be trying to trick the public after all.

Apparently, they didn't think they needed to.
 
Atomises? Say what you see. I see a cloud of concrete dust and surface dust thrown up by the impact. I've seen that clip a few times and it never shows the aftermath - just the dust (deserts are quite dusty).

Edit: Thought these post would be automerged...

See this is the thing I don't get, yep the film would have been nice to go a few more seconds. But you can see a 63ft long plane dissapear into a 4ft wall, you can see it doesn't come out the other end.

Where is the plane gone if it hasn't vapourised? I hope Carol Vordemann isn't in the conspiracy, I used to like her.

Got other things to do tonight, so going to make this my last statement on it. From someone who works in the military, if anyone thinks that it has people in it that would intentionally harm it's own side then they are bonkers. Yes of course you might get the odd ball who loses the plot and goes mental with a gun, but all this is beyond one persons capability.
 
See this is the thing I don't get, yep the film would have been nice to go a few more seconds. But you can see a 63ft long plane dissapear into a 4ft wall, you can see it doesn't come out the other end.

Where is the plane gone if it hasn't vapourised?

What's left of it is within that dust cloud - if you drove a car into a concrete block in the desert at 100mph you'd 'see' exactly the same. Until we can see what's there when the dust settles you can either follow your own eyes, or take the opinion of other who believe it 'vapourised'. The only thing anyone can see on that video, is dust.

I hope Carol Vordemann isn't in the conspiracy, I used to like her.
:)

Got other things to do tonight, so going to make this my last statement on it. From someone who works in the military, if anyone thinks that it has people in it that would intentionally harm it's own side then they are bonkers. Yes of course you might get the odd ball who loses the plot and goes mental with a gun, but all this is beyond one persons capability.

Who gives the military their orders? Do you trust those people totally? Have leaders even been guilty of killing their own people? Is it only leaders of other countries who could do something so terrible? Not ours, eh?

Last comment from me; we readily accept that leaders of other countries do terrible things / are guilty of the most heinous crimes in history - why is it so hard to comprehend that the UK and the US do similar?
 
Now you've let the cat out of the bag.

Mine was a smokescreen

.
 
Of course, he could also be a double agent and really working for the Iranians to destabalise relations. :shock:

I love the internet :cool:



.
 
Now I'm home and had a few tins, the paranoia is really creeping in.

What if ........
He is, in reality, a triple agent and working for his Mossad puppet
masters :shock:

Which brings us full circle to your post:
It's the Jews, they run the World and all it's financial institutions


That's it. First light i'm off into the back garden, diggin me a bunker and straight down to Lidl's at 9am to stock up on some canned food with a 10yr expiry date and a large quantity of Grafenwalder


Anyone that needs some kit, (even if its a "gimp suit" for their Christmas party) should check ot http://www.surviveall.co.uk


.
 
The Wikileaks Twist ..

//The truth is that the American government engages in gross overclassification of documents, something that the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan inveighed against and that the redoubtable Steven Aftergood of the Federation of American Scientists continually battles. Maybe the WikiLeaks is a way of circumventing those restrictions. Getting American threats on record, while pretending to deplore the loss of secrecy, could be a potent weapon. If this is the case, then Obama may be craftier than anyone has assumed.//

http://reason.com/blog/2010/12/01/the-wikileaks-twist

Remember: Nothing is as it seems! Except for those times when it is.
 
Last edited:
He actually works for Alec Salmond, and all these conspiracy theories are designed to throw you off the case..... He orchestrated the 9/11 (9th of November.... nothing happened anywhere in the world on the 9th of November, what's the big deal?) attacks single handedly.

He is wanted for rape and pillaging in a nordic country (might just be rape, I probs made up the pillaging charge)

Might just be me, but I grew up in the 80's and saw plenty evidence on VHS tapes that Scandinavia is quite liberal
 
Last edited:
Why has this thread moved from Wikileaks into this line of babble?

I'm going to tea with EM Forster and Oscar Wilde this afternoon, Elvis has a hairdressing appointment ...
 
Maybe wiki was about to tell about the exsistance of exterterestrial life ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

The Rule #1

Do not insult any other member. Be polite and do business. Thank you!

Members online

Premium Members

Latest Comments

New Threads

Domain Forum Friends

Our Mods' Businesses

*the exceptional businesses of our esteemed moderators
General chit-chat
Help Users
  • No one is chatting at the moment.
      There are no messages in the current room.
      Top Bottom