Name and shame then, who got their hands dirty? Come on, back it up with evidence! Who are these bumbling ghosts no one can prove anything about?
I can't make you see when you refuse to open your eyes.
You want evidence - you have it. Have you looked through the site at the link above? If you have, then unless you
want to believe otherwise the only conclusion that can be met is that the buildings were brought down by explosions.
Why is the official explanation for why and how the twin towers came down based on the buildings having been constructed differently to how they were?
If they were investigating a car crash would it be okay for them to base the event on a Ford Focus when the actual crash was in a Merc S Class? Of course not.
For you to see the evidence for what it is, you need to get rid of the ideas that authorities act correctly all the time; that big secrets can't be kept; that people tell lies. All the large scale autrocities throughout history have involved many people and are lead by people who wield a lot of power.
If you want me to deliver George Bush to your house in person and get him to admit everything, it's not going to happen - I'm afraid you'll have to engage your brain and sort out what's possible from what's not, and then see which side of the argument is factual and which is based on assumtion and false reporting.
You previously stated this, believing it to be correct;
Traditonal steel frame buildings dont, but these were not traditionally constructed box frame, all the support strength was in the outer walls, both severely weakened by impact damage and fire
I have shown that this is wrong - that's proof, isn't it. The strength was from the steel inner core, not the outer walls. Wherever you got that bit of misinformation from (it was from one of the official theories) is flat out wrong. What does that make you think? Seems like you want to now ignore that and now want some other form of proof.
Like I said, I can't make you see through closed eyes.
If it makes a difference, I never questioned the official bullshit for a few years until I realised that a lot of what they want you to believe is impossible. Unless you want to believe it that is.
As you are on the side of the official story, how about you prove part of it to me?
Pick anything...tell me a part of the official story that you believe to be beyond question.
You want names? I don't know who the real powermongers are - the ones behind the scenes of whoever happens to be fronting the Whitehouse at the moment. You think George Bush or Barrack Obama run the show? They're puppets.