Great news, it's no longer a HCID, so what should we do now, Brewsters?
Ignore the lockdown and Worldwide health warnings? Ignore the exponential growth in cases/death stats crippling various healthcare systems? Ignore the lessons from other countries and let people do as they please because it's political collusion by Governments across the World? After all, FDR also said, "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself".
Also, you might want to look up 'https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/', and how conspiracy theories are sprung from selective quotes...
"In other words, Gates is not interested in using vaccines to reduce the population by using them as an agent of death or a tool to sterilize unsuspecting masses. Rather, Gates is interested in keeping more children alive in order to reduce the need for parents to have more children, thus limiting the overall population growth rate."
First of all, I'd like to state that I'm complying with all the measures, so far. Today I was supposed to set off on a 640 mile round trip to pick up a new motorbike that I was excited to be doing. Cancelled it after last nights PM statement. I never panic shopped for anything...despise any fool that did. Ok? I'm not putting anyone in harms way, and support everything the people who work for the NHS are doing. So that's out the way.
Now, I like numbers, and to quote Rick Schwartz, "numbers don't lie". So when one set of numbers doesn't tally to another set, dig down to find out why. Compare Italy with Germany. It's got nothing to do with population age, or air quality, or number of smokers etc - it's all down to what numbers are being compared. And what those numbers represent.
So lets look at figure for the UK.
66.44m population
c. 90k people tested
c. 8k people positive
c. 422 people died
So we're either looking at 5.275% die. Or 0.469% die. Or maybe 0.000635% die.
The only number that has any real meaning is the last one. As the other two rely on totally random factors.
The number 422 - during the same period that this number has built up, 22500 people over the age of 70 have died in the UK. That includes people who previously had a clean bill of health. We know that CV is far more deadly to those with pre-existing conditions...2.7 on average.
Also, the 90k people who have been tested...were only tested because they were showing symptoms. In other words, they had flu like symptoms. I wonder how many of those have gone on to die, but no one gives a monkeys because it wasn't CV. I'll bet any of you it's a sight more than 422.
Come on....Snopes? I didn't realise you were so far behind the curve. I'm embarrassed. Snopes...haha!
So, when a disease gets downgraded...why do the measures get ramped up beyond anything any of us have witnessed? Was this always meant to be the case?