DAC a little broke?

[tifosi]

I just ran 100 queries three times, below are averages.

0.0081050348753976 (8.1ms)
0.007334300787142 (7.3ms)
0.0086547643831461 (8.6ms)

It does get slower in the evening as I mentioned before, still not great though...Will see tomorrow AM, usually considerably slower then.

You know you can round off numbers. picosecond values are a bit insane!

 

[Aaron Clifford]

lol . I do usually, just copied of my timing testing thingy ma bob.

 

[RobMRobM is verified member.]

I'm getting about 6ms average.

 

[Aaron Clifford]

I just ran my dac speed test thingy five times, there is defintely an improvement, it's not as it was but is better than 1.7 seconds RTT.

0.0069990016446255 (6.9ms)
0.0070451698680915 (7.0ms)
0.0067460867437986 (6.7ms)
0.0073132987069612 (7.3ms)
0.0065780960687316 (6.5ms)

Still a couple of ms from what it was, but can't grumble after the speeds I've been getting.

 

[grantwgrantw is verified member.]

Another update, potential fix is going in on the 24th at 7am:

http://registrars.nominet.org.uk/news/system-announcements/dac-maintenance

Grant

 

[Aaron Clifford]

A lot better today.

 

[grantwgrantw is verified member.]

A lot better today.

Yep, much much better.

Grant

 

[js1]

All we need now is some good names to go after

(I think I must looking at the wrong lists the last few days).

 

[StudioVision]

I think I must looking at the wrong lists the last few days.

Don't worry, i'm looking at the same ones!