- Joined
- Dec 8, 2005
- Posts
- 549
- Reaction score
- 15
Hi All,
6 Months ago at a PAB Meeting I asked if there was any reason why the standard DRS 'Expert' could not be published on the Nominet website - 6 months on (and with several follow up requests) here is their answer from Martin Boyle:
...What can I say - is it a satisfactory answer, are Nominet being 'open' about a contract that directly affects Registrants who are involved in a DRS, is the DRS as 'independant' as Nominet make out, is it a good performance from the SMT, are they worth their big fat juicy bonuses?
:evil:
Answers on a post card please.
Regards,
Sneezy.
6 Months ago at a PAB Meeting I asked if there was any reason why the standard DRS 'Expert' could not be published on the Nominet website - 6 months on (and with several follow up requests) here is their answer from Martin Boyle:
"At PAB meetings I have said that this has not been a high priority here, but that we would consider your point and let you have a reply.
There are no legal reasons why the standard DRS expert contract could not be published on the Nominet website.
However, as this is an operational issue and is only of direct relevance to those who apply to become experts, we do not intend to make it publicly available.
While we do want to put a bit more information on the website in the experts section about how to apply etc, and to include in that a basic summary of the terms, this is not a current high priority."
...What can I say - is it a satisfactory answer, are Nominet being 'open' about a contract that directly affects Registrants who are involved in a DRS, is the DRS as 'independant' as Nominet make out, is it a good performance from the SMT, are they worth their big fat juicy bonuses?
Answers on a post card please.
Regards,
Sneezy.