I suspect it puts off a lot. I had to validate with Coinbase (which I didn't like) but refuse to with any other. Fortunately most exchanges don't require ID, as you trade in existing crypto (Bitcoin) rather than Fiat.
There is probably a nice market for an individual to sell BTC to other individuals with a 10% mark up....hmmmmm
I always found conflicting values with google and other places like coinbase. I also got fed up with long loading times. Again I was looking into maybe dipping my toes in but every single place seems to want me to send photo ID and/or a scan of any cards used - this is just not acceptable if crypto is using anonymity as one of its features. Considering how often these places get 'hacked' I'm certainly not giving them a copy of my passport. I wonder how many other people are put off by this.
I'd consider doing this, 10% in my pocket and buyers don't have to disclose their ID to an exchange. Buyers would perhaps be better buying Monero though if they want complete privacy.Let me know
I'd consider doing this, 10% in my pocket and buyers don't have to disclose their ID to an exchange. Buyers would perhaps be better buying Monero though if they want complete privacy.
I believe that the second that something is traced, e.g. for organised criminal activity, and it is found you sold it then be prepared for a bumpy ride. I honestly think it isn't worth the risk. Through the reading I have done (may be things I have missed) it has been asserted that Bitcoin is not truly untraceable through the blockchain and therefore could be exposed by some cleverer people than me.
And I mean of course if this was done at any sort of volume. Exchanges want ID for a good reason.
I believe that the second that something is traced, e.g. for organised criminal activity, and it is found you sold it then be prepared for a bumpy ride. I honestly think it isn't worth the risk. Through the reading I have done (may be things I have missed) it has been asserted that Bitcoin is not truly untraceable through the blockchain and therefore could be exposed by some cleverer people than me.
And I mean of course if this was done at any sort of volume. Exchanges want ID for a good reason.
I believe that the second that something is traced, e.g. for organised criminal activity, and it is found you sold it then be prepared for a bumpy ride. I honestly think it isn't worth the risk. Through the reading I have done (may be things I have missed) it has been asserted that Bitcoin is not truly untraceable through the blockchain and therefore could be exposed by some cleverer people than me.
And I mean of course if this was done at any sort of volume. Exchanges want ID for a good reason.
Massive volume since though, second biggest in history helping the recovery. Lot of talk that Binance hack is specific to those handing over their API keys the a third party app that then sold all their ALT coins for Bitcoin. Not sure whether they then got the BTC out, I assume so, but Binance have reacted quickly and prevented all withdraws.
Yep, sold to BTC as cannot be exchanged for VIA directly. No crypto has been withdrawn it seems, just a case of using a hack to inflate the price of VIA so the ppl behind it could sell what they had at the top. Still a concern for Binance I'm sure.I think the hack converted loads of alts to btc then bought lots of hugely overpriced via coin off the hackers. Or something like that it seems
Malta favour crypto, but boy, I'd not like to handle discussions with the Maltese government!!! I suspect plenty of cash (or crypto) changed hands in that one!So Binance is moving to Malta.
Any further news or rumours on the Tether situation?