- Joined
- Jun 14, 2004
- Posts
- 11,191
- Reaction score
- 1,059
Welcome to AcornDomains.co.uk, a friendly community for UK domain investors, developers and anyone interested in domain names.
Whether you're looking to buy or sell domains, learn more about the UK domain market, get feedback on your names, or simply chat with other domainers, you're in the right place. AcornDomains has been bringing together people from across the UK domain industry for many years, from complete beginners to experienced investors.
Have a look around, join the discussions and, if you haven't already, create a free account and introduce yourself.
I'm sure most people here wouldn't agree, but I don't think that's a constructive way to view a non-exec role.
If you stand, you should deliver on the whole role, not just the one issue you care most about..
I'm sure most people here wouldn't agree, but I don't think that's a constructive way to view a non-exec role.
If you stand, you should deliver on the whole role, not just the one issue you care most about..
I agree with that as well. The non-exec director elections are not the venue for what Graeme's trying to accomplish, IMO.
Do people think I'm going to start throwing chairs around? lol
Cheers guys, I am hoping it won't be necessary to stand. There are still ongoing things that are advancing that I can't talk about which means I may not need to. They won't be censoring my election statement this year either, that is for sure. There is still the EGM to discuss .uk and Derivative action on the books on completion of other stuff that I can't talk about.
When you say you may not need to stand, I don't understand?
I thought you were standing to watch over nominet and how they do things?
Are you meaning that you won't be standing if all your issues are sorted?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.